Difference between revisions of "Talk:First Battle of Mons Dei"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(→Additional Commentary) |
m (voted) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote ( | + | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (3/0/1) </h3> |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
#A well written story that provides all the facts in a great read.[[User:HailandKill|HailandKill]] 04:20, 30 December 2005 (GMT) | #A well written story that provides all the facts in a great read.[[User:HailandKill|HailandKill]] 04:20, 30 December 2005 (GMT) | ||
#An excellent edition towards the entire collection. If all other articles concerning the war are written with the same dedication I have little doubt that the entire 'War of Golden Sucession' will be nominated. [[Sarcanza]] | #An excellent edition towards the entire collection. If all other articles concerning the war are written with the same dedication I have little doubt that the entire 'War of Golden Sucession' will be nominated. [[Sarcanza]] | ||
| − | + | #I'll give a self-vote for this article. 18:19, 5 January 2006 (GMT) | |
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
Revision as of 14:19, 5 January 2006
First Battle of Mons Dei FAC Vote (3/0/1)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- A well written story that provides all the facts in a great read.HailandKill 04:20, 30 December 2005 (GMT)
- An excellent edition towards the entire collection. If all other articles concerning the war are written with the same dedication I have little doubt that the entire 'War of Golden Sucession' will be nominated. Sarcanza
- I'll give a self-vote for this article. 18:19, 5 January 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
- Not a bad article, but I find that it is a little hard to understand, especially the lead section. I'd like a little more background on the war in this article before I support this. → Ceo \ squawk 04:28, 30 December 2005 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
- Understandable Ceo; I'll do my best to adress those concerns. Thanks also to Hailandkill; we were talking about the article and FAC issues, and I guess he decided to go for it! Macabees 04:58, 30 December 2005 (GMT)
Additional Commentary
This is a pretty well written article.
And I wish I hadn't ceased to exist so I could of participated... (Keyshona)
This was a good IC fight for me, and a damned good story if I say so myself. (Hailandkill)
