Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gameplay/Archive"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(→{{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (4/0/0)) |
(→{{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (5/0/0)) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
# Agree --[[User:80.3.160.8|80.3.160.8]] 13:07, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT) | # Agree --[[User:80.3.160.8|80.3.160.8]] 13:07, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT) | ||
| − | |||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
# | # | ||
Revision as of 09:07, 7 January 2005
Gameplay/Archive FAC Vote (5/0/0)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I'm self-nominating this page as a FAC. → Fris Θtalk 20:01, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT) My intent was to codify the different levels of playing experience in NationStates, and I had hoped that others would step up and add any significant areas I missed. Since no one has added anything, I guess I did ok. Also, I'd like to see featured articles represent a broader base than just natives and regions, and this is the best Gameplaying article I've seen.
- Very comprehensive and informative analysis. -- Wilem Engelking 11:27, 9 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- As said above very factually correct and informative TBF 21:01, 28 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- In addition to what has already been asserted above, I believe it to be well composed. Rechze • (talk) 09:07, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Oppose
- Agree --80.3.160.8 13:07, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Neutral
Comments/Questions
- To be fair I think it has got too many tiny paragraphs with small titles and I'm not too fond of the indents either. The game terms table should also be moved down and placed in context by integrating it in the 'languageplay' section IMO. Its cluttery, at present. I'd rework it but I would like to have opinions on this first, if possible. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 12:10, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)
