|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (7/0/0) </h3>
| + | FAC vote and subsequent posting was removed and placed in [[/Archive]]. FAC status was removed by me because the nation in question has been deleted by the mods for offensive content. Which is too bad, since this is a good page, to be honest. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 18:56, 14 March 2006 (GMT) |
| − | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Support'''
| + | |
| − | # I '''support''' for the reasons stated below. This is a well written article and offers spectacular information over the nation of Guffingford; not to mention, this article has received an outstanding amount of traffic since it was first begun. In my opinion, I see no reason why this shouldn't be a featured article. [[User:Macabees|Macabees]] 20:44, 29 December 2005 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # I agree with Mac. It's getting even better. (Edit: And I think the OOC Preamble thing is one of the most original additions to an article we've seen for a while.) --[[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] 00:20, 30 December 2005 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # I'm also supporting this! Not only because I wrote everything, but it deserves a place on the featured articles list. And I'll see if I can improve the layout, I've been seriously messing around with the Wiki code. - [[Guffingford]], posted on the last day of 2005! [[User:Guffingford|Guffingford]] 11:18, 31 December 2005 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # I'm changing my vote to yes after Guffingford's changes which seriously improved it. '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#00CCCC">→ Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#0066CC">squawk</font>]]''''' 16:15, 31 December 2005 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # As an ''in toto'' article, I'm not sure it's '''the''' example to set, but it is a well-composed, interesting read, and there's certainly plenty that would make for a good FA slot on the [[Main Page|main page]], as it's split into sections, so I'd '''support''' it. Out of interest, why did you take the colour out of the parties section at the bottom? I thought that looked better will colours than grey. [[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 17:50, 31 December 2005 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # I '''support''' this article as being extremely well-written.[[User:Skinny|Skinny]] 16:50, 3 February 2006 (GMT) [[User:129.12.225.205|129.12.225.205]] 18:06, 23 January 2006 (GMT)<font color=gray>
| + | |
| − | # I '''support''' this article because it is one of the the most detailed and well thought out history i have seen [[User:82.35.114.43|82.35.114.43]] 11:50, 29 January 2006 (GMT)</font>
| + | |
| − | # I '''support''' this article as it well-written and thought-out, with a detailed history section and a good use of photographs. [[User:88.105.245.221|88.105.245.221]] <- Me [[User:Praetonia|Praetonia]] 14:54, 14 February 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Oppose'''
| + | |
| − | #
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Neutral'''
| + | |
| − | #<s>I find that although the content is brilliant, the layout is a bit difficult. '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#00CCCC">→ Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#0066CC">squawk</font>]]''''' 05:04, 30 December 2005 (GMT)</s>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Comments/Questions'''
| + | |
| − | * Ceo, I see your point. But '''what''' about the layout is difficult? --[[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] 20:37, 30 December 2005 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | **<s>Yes, sorry I was a bit unclear. I mean that the mix of OOC, IC, OOC tags, tables without borders and such make it a bit hard to figure out what the nation is, what it stands for, what's important and what's not, etc. '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#00CCCC">→ Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#0066CC">squawk</font>]]''''' 20:45, 30 December 2005 (GMT)</s>Edit: It looks better now. '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#00CCCC">→ Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#0066CC">squawk</font>]]''''' 16:15, 31 December 2005 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | *I think the language with regards to Knootian independence could stand to be a little more NPOV. I'll try to fix a bit of it myself. --[[User:Knootoss||Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 02:19, 3 January 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==FAC==
| + | |
| − | I decided to give this FAC status. I think it well deserves it, being the target of many viewers and readers, and moreover, well written and highly factual. So, in my opinion it deserves a go.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==IP Voting==
| + | |
| − | Votes 6, 7 and 8 cannot be counted until the voters login and account for their vote. Plus the explanations are all suspiciously similar... (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 18:34, 31 January 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==REPLY!==
| + | |
| − | The last two are Skinny and Praetonia I believe, the first one is unknown. And the fact the IPs are similar doesn't mean a thing. It seems all three are from the UK, and maybe on the same host.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Yes, sorry, one of those is mine. I keep forgetting to log into the damn website. Apologies [[User:Skinny|Skinny]] 16:48, 3 February 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ____________
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Aye, one of those was me. Not sure which one though - I agree they are all very similar. I'll take number 8. If I was the other one then sorry to whoever was number 8. Also, the above psoter (not Skinny) is right about the IPs. They are UK IPs which are not a particularly large range. [[User:Praetonia|Praetonia]] 14:54, 14 February 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
