Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gulden/Archive"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (2/0/0) </h3>
+
<h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (3/0/0) </h3>
 
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
 
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
  
Line 5: Line 5:
 
#I think this deserves a chance to be featured. Since this is the only currency related article containing so much information on a monetary system and its history, I'd like to give it a shot. Tell me what you think. [[User:Guffingford|The Mystery Man]] 09:51, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
 
#I think this deserves a chance to be featured. Since this is the only currency related article containing so much information on a monetary system and its history, I'd like to give it a shot. Tell me what you think. [[User:Guffingford|The Mystery Man]] 09:51, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
 
#Seconded. It's a good and original article. [[User:Hogsweat|Hogsweat]] 09:54, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
 
#Seconded. It's a good and original article. [[User:Hogsweat|Hogsweat]] 09:54, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
 +
#'''Support''': a nice article on a relatively untouched subject. The only problem, if it does get featured, will be which bits to use, as most of the tables are too bulky. [[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 14:25, 7 March 2006 (GMT)
  
 
'''Oppose'''
 
'''Oppose'''

Revision as of 10:25, 7 March 2006

Gulden/Archive FAC Vote (3/0/0)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

  1. I think this deserves a chance to be featured. Since this is the only currency related article containing so much information on a monetary system and its history, I'd like to give it a shot. Tell me what you think. The Mystery Man 09:51, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
  2. Seconded. It's a good and original article. Hogsweat 09:54, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
  3. Support: a nice article on a relatively untouched subject. The only problem, if it does get featured, will be which bits to use, as most of the tables are too bulky. Gruen2alk 14:25, 7 March 2006 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments/Questions