|
|
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (1/3/1) </h3>
| + | The FAC vote on this article was moved to [[/Archive]] by (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 19:45, 21 December 2006 (GMT) . |
| − | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | '''Support'''
| + | === Consensus reached === |
| − | #'''Self-nomination support''' - It's on a more specialist topic than normal, and I think it's well-written. I would believe this would probably be given B-class status at Wikipedia if this was a Wikipedia article. I've tried my best to make this as much like a Wikipedia cyclone article (there are '''twelve''' Wikipedia cyclone Featured Articles), and I think I've done a good job. Please tell me if there's any way I can improve this, but I think it's already very, very good. [[User:Liverpool England|LE]] ([[Wikipedia:User:NSLE|WP]]) | [[User_talk:Liverpool_England|Talk]] 10:26, 4 June 2006 (GMT)
| + | * '''Last vote''': [[User:Jey]] opposed, 18th October 2006 |
| − | | + | * '''Voting tally''': 1 '''<font color=green>support</font>''', 6 '''<font color=red>oppose</font>''', 2 '''<font color=gold>neutral</font>''' |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Oppose'''
| + | |
| − | # Doesn't go "above and beyond" general article standards. A good article, but not featured quality. The article really seems to be written for a template: it seems like it includes standard facts but no interesting and neat-to-read material. '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#000080">Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#ff0000">rant</font>]] <font color=white>\</font> [[Special:Contributions/Ceorana|<font color=white>rave</font>]]''''' 02:33, 6 June 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | #:Why don't '''''you''''' try writing it then? Could you be clearer in your criticism? What exactly does it lack? [[User:Liverpool England|LE]] ([[Wikipedia:User:NSLE|WP]]) | [[User_talk:Liverpool_England|Talk]] 04:43, 7 June 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | #::I'd say this is a good, solid article. It's got a lot of facts and is of good use. However, it's just not strong enough to go on the main page. It lacks voice and details. I know this is an encyclopedia, so the writing will naturally be a bit dry, but in order to be featured, an article needs to have better prose and more ''interesting'' details. I hope I'm being clear enough... [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 01:15, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # A bit short, and should have less dead links. [[User:Lightman|Lightman]] 18:19, 5 September 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | #:It isn't my fault that the others in my region have chosen not to start NSWiki articles. It shouldn't be penalised for that. [[User:Liverpool England|LE]] ([[Wikipedia:fr:Utilisateur:NSLE|WP]]) | [[User_talk:Liverpool_England|Talk]] 05:14, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # Good article, but is nowhere near the quality of all the other featured articles. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 15:11, 7 October 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Neutral''' | + | |
| − | # On the one hand, I support this inasmuch as I'd like to see a greater diversity of featured articles, and as it seems as good an article as one could do for a hurricane. On the other hand, it is a little dry and specialist, and I worry about its relevance. As to the dead links issue...whilst I agree the author shouldn't be 'penalised' for others' sloth, dead links should in general be avoided. Basically, I'm open to persuasion on this one. Nice infobox. [[Special:Contributions/Gruenberg2|<font color="blue">~</font>]][[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 10:30, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # Agreed with Gruen - support because of the excellent ideas LE has and the effort he's put in here, but it's a dry, sometimes irrelevant and not-necessarily-featurable topic. Article's solid, topic's questionable for featureability. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 05:01, 13 October 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Comments/Questions''' | + | |
| − | *''Moved from support: only registered users may vote.'' '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#000080">Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#ff0000">rant</font>]] <font color=white>\</font> [[Special:Contributions/Ceorana|<font color=white>rave</font>]]''''' 02:33, 6 June 2006 (GMT) :
| + | |
| − | *#I think this has potential. [[User:153.20.95.69|153.20.95.69]]
| + | |
| − | *#Thumbs up from me... [[User:58.6.47.219|58.6.47.219]] 08:38, 5 June 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
