Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lineartinc"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(Typo.) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
--Praetonia | --Praetonia | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anyone? Could the original author comment on this please, because this article is quite baffling to me and sounds extremely unobjective. Maybe I've been missing something, but I've never heard either myself or Lineartinc described as "biased and corrupted", or even "biased" or "corrupt". Indeed, how is it possible to be "biased" or "corrupt" if, as the article goes onto to point out on the same line "very rarely are users warned". I really dont mind be called biased and corrupt so long as the people making these allegations substantiate them, or at least explain their reasons. [[User:Praetonia|Praetonia]] 12:29, 15 February 2006 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 08:29, 15 February 2006
Who has described us as being biased and corrupt? I dont remember this...
--Praetonia
Anyone? Could the original author comment on this please, because this article is quite baffling to me and sounds extremely unobjective. Maybe I've been missing something, but I've never heard either myself or Lineartinc described as "biased and corrupted", or even "biased" or "corrupt". Indeed, how is it possible to be "biased" or "corrupt" if, as the article goes onto to point out on the same line "very rarely are users warned". I really dont mind be called biased and corrupt so long as the people making these allegations substantiate them, or at least explain their reasons. Praetonia 12:29, 15 February 2006 (GMT)
