Difference between revisions of "Talk:Menelmacar"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m (Correcting signature place.) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
# This article is just a filling in of the CIA factbook pattern. So I fail to see why it would fit better on the main page than the many other CIA factbook patterned articles. [[User:Jester|Jester]] 22:17, 29 September 2005 (GMT) | # This article is just a filling in of the CIA factbook pattern. So I fail to see why it would fit better on the main page than the many other CIA factbook patterned articles. [[User:Jester|Jester]] 22:17, 29 September 2005 (GMT) | ||
+ | # Same. It is a copied factbook, does not do anything unique. --[[User:Knootoss||Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 23:23, 29 September 2005 (GMT) | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' |
Revision as of 19:23, 29 September 2005
I am not exactly sure what to do with all these headers. Thoughts? -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 15:04, 23 Oct 2004 (GMT)
FAC Vote
Menelmacar FAC Vote (2/0/0)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- It's a good, well written article, and would fit nicely on the main page. Nightbane 21:31, 4 August 2005 (GMT)
- Yes, I very much the layout: it's a good example of an in-depth nation article.Gruenberg 17:41, 9 August 2005 (GMT)
Oppose
- This article is just a filling in of the CIA factbook pattern. So I fail to see why it would fit better on the main page than the many other CIA factbook patterned articles. Jester 22:17, 29 September 2005 (GMT)
- Same. It is a copied factbook, does not do anything unique. --|Knoot|KNOOtalk 23:23, 29 September 2005 (GMT)
Neutral
Comments/Questions