Difference between revisions of "Talk:Myroria"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
#This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT) | #This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | Do you have any suggestions for what I could do to improve it? | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' |
Revision as of 13:36, 19 November 2006
You cannot follow Pope Emmanuel if you are not in the region of European Continent, Middle East, American Continent, African Continent, or Asian Continent. --Lightman 17:41, 9 June 2006 (GMT)
OK. Myroria 03:55, 27 July 2006 (GMT)
Featured Article?
Myroria FAC Vote (2/1/1)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- Yeah, yeah. It's a self-nomination. I'm probably screwing myself over just by doing that, but I'm so narcissistic (sp?) I couldn't resist. My reasoning is that it is long and detailed, has a lot of, well, I can't call them facts since my nation isn't real, but, made up facts? It has good grammar and spelling, and I tried to keep POV out of it as best I could.
- I like it. I'm copying the format for Chirondom, actually. Lightman 01:23, 16 November 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
- This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. Ceoranta 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT)
Do you have any suggestions for what I could do to improve it?
Neutral
- Not a bad start - needs more content and then it might be a featured-calibre article. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 08:09, 1 October 2006 (GMT)
Comments/Questions