Difference between revisions of "Talk:Myroria"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
== Featured Article? ==
 
== Featured Article? ==
  
−
<h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (2/3/1) </h3>
+
<h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (2/4/1) </h3>
  
 
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
 
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
Line 16: Line 16:
 
#This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT)
 
#This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT)
 
#'''Strongly oppose''' He calls himself a benevolent dictatorship in the article, yet, his UN catagory is "capitolist paradise". Sorry but, no it isn't. [[User:Anarchy Balsac|Anarchy Balsac]] 03:53, 10 December 2006 (GMT)
 
#'''Strongly oppose''' He calls himself a benevolent dictatorship in the article, yet, his UN catagory is "capitolist paradise". Sorry but, no it isn't. [[User:Anarchy Balsac|Anarchy Balsac]] 03:53, 10 December 2006 (GMT)
 +
:On this specific point of AB's, three comments. a) There is no contradiction whatsoever between being a "benevolent dictatorship" and a "capitalist paradise" at the same time. b) A UN category is merely an indication, which the player may do with as he or she wishes, and not something to be strictly adhered to. (Where's your creativity, AB?) c) In considering whether to feature an NSwiki article, the question you raise strikes me as beside the point. [[User:Aridd|Aridd]] 23:15, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
 
#'''Strongly oppose''' The neutrality of his first paragraph is disputed. After many RP troubles people in the lexicon have questioned his realism in his nation. Such factors of his nations are ignored such as the lower class problems, puppet wanking to make a larger budget/population, over exaggeration of elements for power. The article is grade A but the content and neutrality is disputed. [[User:Saint Oz|Saint Oz]] 12:05 PM, 2 January 2007 (GMT)
 
#'''Strongly oppose''' The neutrality of his first paragraph is disputed. After many RP troubles people in the lexicon have questioned his realism in his nation. Such factors of his nations are ignored such as the lower class problems, puppet wanking to make a larger budget/population, over exaggeration of elements for power. The article is grade A but the content and neutrality is disputed. [[User:Saint Oz|Saint Oz]] 12:05 PM, 2 January 2007 (GMT)
−
-I don't want to seem imposing, but I don't see that as a reason to '''strongly oppose''' it. There is a difference between UN category and RP'd nation type.[[User:Myroria|The Aristocratic Thalassocracy of Myroria]] 23:02, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
+
:I don't want to seem imposing, but I don't see that as a reason to '''strongly oppose''' it. There is a difference between UN category and RP'd nation type.[[User:Myroria|The Aristocratic Thalassocracy of Myroria]] 23:02, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
−
:On this specific point of AB's, three comments. a) There is no contradiction whatsoever between being a "benevolent dictatorship" and a "capitalist paradise" at the same time. b) A UN category is merely an indication, which the player may do with as he or she wishes, and not something to be strictly adhered to. (Where's your creativity, AB?) c) In considering whether to feature an NSwiki article, the question you raise strikes me as beside the point. [[User:Aridd|Aridd]] 23:15, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
+
#No offense, but I don't see how this can possibly be considered feature material. Nowhere ''near'' that level. [[User:Omigodtheykilledkenny|Omigodtheykilledkenny]] 15:44, 22 July 2007 (GMT)
−
 
+
−
 
+
  
 
'''Neutral'''
 
'''Neutral'''

Revision as of 11:44, 22 July 2007

You cannot follow Pope Emmanuel if you are not in the region of European Continent, Middle East, American Continent, African Continent, or Asian Continent. --Lightman 17:41, 9 June 2006 (GMT)

OK. Myroria 03:55, 27 July 2006 (GMT)

Featured Article?

Myroria FAC Vote (2/4/1)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

  1. Yeah, yeah. It's a self-nomination. I'm probably screwing myself over just by doing that, but I'm so narcissistic (sp?) I couldn't resist. My reasoning is that it is long and detailed, has a lot of, well, I can't call them facts since my nation isn't real, but, made up facts? It has good grammar and spelling, and I tried to keep POV out of it as best I could.
  2. I like it. I'm copying the format for Chirondom, actually. Lightman 01:23, 16 November 2006 (GMT)

Oppose

  1. This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. Ceoranta 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT)
  2. Strongly oppose He calls himself a benevolent dictatorship in the article, yet, his UN catagory is "capitolist paradise". Sorry but, no it isn't. Anarchy Balsac 03:53, 10 December 2006 (GMT)
On this specific point of AB's, three comments. a) There is no contradiction whatsoever between being a "benevolent dictatorship" and a "capitalist paradise" at the same time. b) A UN category is merely an indication, which the player may do with as he or she wishes, and not something to be strictly adhered to. (Where's your creativity, AB?) c) In considering whether to feature an NSwiki article, the question you raise strikes me as beside the point. Aridd 23:15, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
  1. Strongly oppose The neutrality of his first paragraph is disputed. After many RP troubles people in the lexicon have questioned his realism in his nation. Such factors of his nations are ignored such as the lower class problems, puppet wanking to make a larger budget/population, over exaggeration of elements for power. The article is grade A but the content and neutrality is disputed. Saint Oz 12:05 PM, 2 January 2007 (GMT)
I don't want to seem imposing, but I don't see that as a reason to strongly oppose it. There is a difference between UN category and RP'd nation type.The Aristocratic Thalassocracy of Myroria 23:02, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
  1. No offense, but I don't see how this can possibly be considered feature material. Nowhere near that level. Omigodtheykilledkenny 15:44, 22 July 2007 (GMT)

Neutral

  1. Not a bad start - needs more content and then it might be a featured-calibre article. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 08:09, 1 October 2006 (GMT)

Comments/Questions

Moved from support (unregistered users cannot vote):

  1. Its good. Good nation building work here, and well worth nominating! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.206.102.104 · (talk)
  2. Nice work! Very well written article. I nominate this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.118.106.220 · (talk)

Updating soon

There's been a recent schism in The Lexicon, causing me to leave it. I will update this NSWiki page soon, once I get my bearings and handle things in the region myself and some friends made. Please refrain from voting any more until this happens. Myroria Talk to me 19:52, 4 January 2007 (GMT)

Retrieved from "http://archive.nswiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Myroria&oldid=306349"