Difference between revisions of "Talk:Myroria"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
'''Oppose'''
 
'''Oppose'''
 
#This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT)
 
#This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT)
Do you have any suggestions on how I could improve it?[[User:Myroria/Signature]] 17:40, 19 November 2006 (GMT)
+
Do you have any suggestions on how I could improve it? [[User:Myroria/Signature]] 17:40, 19 November 2006 (GMT)
  
 
'''Neutral'''
 
'''Neutral'''

Revision as of 13:40, 19 November 2006

You cannot follow Pope Emmanuel if you are not in the region of European Continent, Middle East, American Continent, African Continent, or Asian Continent. --Lightman 17:41, 9 June 2006 (GMT)

OK. Myroria 03:55, 27 July 2006 (GMT)

Featured Article?

Myroria FAC Vote (2/1/1)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

  1. Yeah, yeah. It's a self-nomination. I'm probably screwing myself over just by doing that, but I'm so narcissistic (sp?) I couldn't resist. My reasoning is that it is long and detailed, has a lot of, well, I can't call them facts since my nation isn't real, but, made up facts? It has good grammar and spelling, and I tried to keep POV out of it as best I could.
  2. I like it. I'm copying the format for Chirondom, actually. Lightman 01:23, 16 November 2006 (GMT)

Oppose

  1. This has serious potential to become a featured article - I think you've got a great base to work from. But it definitely needs more content: the sections are a bit short and don't provide juicy details that make an article really feature-worthy. Ceoranta 02:19, 18 November 2006 (GMT)

Do you have any suggestions on how I could improve it? User:Myroria/Signature 17:40, 19 November 2006 (GMT)

Neutral

  1. Not a bad start - needs more content and then it might be a featured-calibre article. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 08:09, 1 October 2006 (GMT)

Comments/Questions