Difference between revisions of "Talk:NationStates (IRC channel)"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Nanakaland (Talk | contribs) |
Gruenberg2 (Talk | contribs) (Banlist) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think 'operator' should be used as opposed to 'moderator.' Treznor, Nathi and Eadwacer aren't NationStates moderators, so the use of it should be avoided. | I think 'operator' should be used as opposed to 'moderator.' Treznor, Nathi and Eadwacer aren't NationStates moderators, so the use of it should be avoided. | ||
| − | #NationStates isn't always the biggest NationStates channel. #NationStates_General beats it occassionaly. In fact, tonight #NationStates and #NationStates_General swapped the top NS position several times. [[User:Nanakaland|Nanakaland]] 02:25, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT) | + | <nowiki>#NationStates</nowiki> isn't always the biggest NationStates channel. #NationStates_General beats it occassionaly. In fact, tonight #NationStates and #NationStates_General swapped the top NS position several times. [[User:Nanakaland|Nanakaland]] 02:25, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
| + | |||
| + | ==Banlist== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is not going to win me many friends, and I assure you I'm not trying to stir anything. But the 'huge banlist' no longer exists. I don't think the circumstances around that need be mentioned, but I do feel the line should be removed, as it no longer applies. [[User:Gruenberg2|Gruenberg2]] 00:25, 10 October 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 9 October 2005
Main
I think 'operator' should be used as opposed to 'moderator.' Treznor, Nathi and Eadwacer aren't NationStates moderators, so the use of it should be avoided.
#NationStates isn't always the biggest NationStates channel. #NationStates_General beats it occassionaly. In fact, tonight #NationStates and #NationStates_General swapped the top NS position several times. Nanakaland 02:25, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT)
Banlist
This is not going to win me many friends, and I assure you I'm not trying to stir anything. But the 'huge banlist' no longer exists. I don't think the circumstances around that need be mentioned, but I do feel the line should be removed, as it no longer applies. Gruenberg2 00:25, 10 October 2005 (GMT)
