Difference between revisions of "Talk:Neutral zone"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m |
(procedural nomination for deletion) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I do not believe this subject merits a seperate article. It has no real content, no content, no links to it at all, just a "coming soon" marker. If it remains like this I move that it be deleted. Also because the name is so general, there are a lot of other neutral zones no doubt· --[[User:Knootoss||Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 14:18, 2 October 2005 (GMT) | I do not believe this subject merits a seperate article. It has no real content, no content, no links to it at all, just a "coming soon" marker. If it remains like this I move that it be deleted. Also because the name is so general, there are a lot of other neutral zones no doubt· --[[User:Knootoss||Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 14:18, 2 October 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Procedural nomination.'' And Knoot, you should know to list things on [[NSwiki:Deletion]]. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 21:48, 11 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 11 November 2005
I do not believe this subject merits a seperate article. It has no real content, no content, no links to it at all, just a "coming soon" marker. If it remains like this I move that it be deleted. Also because the name is so general, there are a lot of other neutral zones no doubt· --|Knoot|KNOOtalk 14:18, 2 October 2005 (GMT)
Procedural nomination. And Knoot, you should know to list things on NSwiki:Deletion. --Goobergunch|? 21:48, 11 November 2005 (GMT)
