Difference between revisions of "Talk:Neutral zone"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Gruenberg2 (Talk | contribs) m (Concur with deletion.) |
(closing discussion) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{ConsensusToDelete|24 December 2005}} --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]]''' | ||
| + | |||
I do not believe this subject merits a seperate article. It has no real content, no content, no links to it at all, just a "coming soon" marker. If it remains like this I move that it be deleted. Also because the name is so general, there are a lot of other neutral zones no doubt· --[[User:Knootoss||Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 14:18, 2 October 2005 (GMT) | I do not believe this subject merits a seperate article. It has no real content, no content, no links to it at all, just a "coming soon" marker. If it remains like this I move that it be deleted. Also because the name is so general, there are a lot of other neutral zones no doubt· --[[User:Knootoss||Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 14:18, 2 October 2005 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:35, 23 December 2005
Deletion discussion
This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 24 December 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|?
I do not believe this subject merits a seperate article. It has no real content, no content, no links to it at all, just a "coming soon" marker. If it remains like this I move that it be deleted. Also because the name is so general, there are a lot of other neutral zones no doubt· --|Knoot|KNOOtalk 14:18, 2 October 2005 (GMT)
Procedural nomination. And Knoot, you should know to list things on NSwiki:Deletion. --Goobergunch|? 21:48, 11 November 2005 (GMT)
