Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nikolaos The Great"
(attributing anonymous edit) |
Nanakaland (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Whilst I appreciate the statsbox is down, these statistics vary with the issues you answer (as I'm sure you are aware) and when the statsbox returns, the current stats will be accessible quickly. As these stats will only be true for the day you wrote them, it might be more worth your while not putting them up because they'll be out of day by the time you read this unless you receive no issues by shoice. Updating it every single day is not approved (it's not allowed for the population statistic, so I strongly doubt it'll be excused with all those ecomony stats) because old versions are saved on Goobergunch's server and this will result in wasted space. May I suggest you remove them? Otherwise, the page is pretty coherent.[[User:IdioC|IdioC]]-[[User_talk:IdioC | エドの狂い<small>talk</small>]] 21:46, 29 Jan 2005 (GMT) | Whilst I appreciate the statsbox is down, these statistics vary with the issues you answer (as I'm sure you are aware) and when the statsbox returns, the current stats will be accessible quickly. As these stats will only be true for the day you wrote them, it might be more worth your while not putting them up because they'll be out of day by the time you read this unless you receive no issues by shoice. Updating it every single day is not approved (it's not allowed for the population statistic, so I strongly doubt it'll be excused with all those ecomony stats) because old versions are saved on Goobergunch's server and this will result in wasted space. May I suggest you remove them? Otherwise, the page is pretty coherent.[[User:IdioC|IdioC]]-[[User_talk:IdioC | エドの狂い<small>talk</small>]] 21:46, 29 Jan 2005 (GMT) | ||
::I would agree that that assessment. I think stats like that are just pretty much a lot of filler that not a lot of people are going to read through anyway. If I were the author of this article, I'd spend a lot more time fleshing out the government and history details than putting in out-of-date statistics. (Unsigned comment by [[User:Dorado|Dorado]]) | ::I would agree that that assessment. I think stats like that are just pretty much a lot of filler that not a lot of people are going to read through anyway. If I were the author of this article, I'd spend a lot more time fleshing out the government and history details than putting in out-of-date statistics. (Unsigned comment by [[User:Dorado|Dorado]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==FAC?== | ||
| + | Is this really a featured article candidate? I don't see any voting section. [[User:Nanakaland|Nanakaland]] 20:12, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 16:12, 11 March 2005
Economy/Budget
Whilst I appreciate the statsbox is down, these statistics vary with the issues you answer (as I'm sure you are aware) and when the statsbox returns, the current stats will be accessible quickly. As these stats will only be true for the day you wrote them, it might be more worth your while not putting them up because they'll be out of day by the time you read this unless you receive no issues by shoice. Updating it every single day is not approved (it's not allowed for the population statistic, so I strongly doubt it'll be excused with all those ecomony stats) because old versions are saved on Goobergunch's server and this will result in wasted space. May I suggest you remove them? Otherwise, the page is pretty coherent.IdioC- エドの狂いtalk 21:46, 29 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- I would agree that that assessment. I think stats like that are just pretty much a lot of filler that not a lot of people are going to read through anyway. If I were the author of this article, I'd spend a lot more time fleshing out the government and history details than putting in out-of-date statistics. (Unsigned comment by Dorado)
FAC?
Is this really a featured article candidate? I don't see any voting section. Nanakaland 20:12, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
