Difference between revisions of "Talk:Particle beam weapon"
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'll be linking to this and similar generalized-but-NS articles when I wikify some of my hardware. [[User:Santa Barbara|SB]] | I'll be linking to this and similar generalized-but-NS articles when I wikify some of my hardware. [[User:Santa Barbara|SB]] | ||
| − | Actually, since ''all'' the author has done was, apparently, using [http://www.ndu.edu/ctnsp/Nielsen-EDEW.pdf THIS] source, turning it into a rather tiny article while mast... Errr... reveling over his ability to do a simple (And not even an especially good one) summary, AND considering that this is ''only'' dealing with physics, rather than with anything NS specific... Kill it. Otherwise, you would prolly need to 'legalise' articles about, say, the way a M1A1 or AK47 works, will all technical details, which I think is ''not'' appropriate for NSwiki. | + | Actually, since ''all'' the author has done was, apparently, using [http://www.ndu.edu/ctnsp/Nielsen-EDEW.pdf THIS] source, turning it into a rather tiny article while mast... Errr... reveling over his ability to do a simple (And not even an especially good one) summary, AND considering that this is ''only'' dealing with physics, rather than with anything NS specific... Kill it. Otherwise, you would prolly need to 'legalise' articles about, say, the way a M1A1 or AK47 works, will all technical details, which I think is ''not'' appropriate for NSwiki. |
| + | |||
| + | PS: Grargh, forgot to sign. And to log in, for that matter. [[User:Rezo|Rezo]] 09:22, 5 Jan 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 05:22, 5 January 2005
This article is both widowed and orphaned (there are no links to or from it). Even though there is no Wikipedia article on this topic, it needs to have a NS reason for existing, or it should be recommended for deletion.
Oh, and I added it to Category:Hardware, for now. -- Frisbeeteria 04:05, 9 Oct 2004 (GMT)
I'll be linking to this and similar generalized-but-NS articles when I wikify some of my hardware. SB
Actually, since all the author has done was, apparently, using THIS source, turning it into a rather tiny article while mast... Errr... reveling over his ability to do a simple (And not even an especially good one) summary, AND considering that this is only dealing with physics, rather than with anything NS specific... Kill it. Otherwise, you would prolly need to 'legalise' articles about, say, the way a M1A1 or AK47 works, will all technical details, which I think is not appropriate for NSwiki.
PS: Grargh, forgot to sign. And to log in, for that matter. Rezo 09:22, 5 Jan 2005 (GMT)
