Talk:Rejistanian

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Revision as of 20:00, 17 January 2005 by Rejistania (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Rejistanian FAC Vote (2/0/1)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ~~~~ and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

  1. I fully support this as the 'nominator'. I believe this is a fascinating article that gives an easy insight into the language that is Rejistanian. I believe this would make a great featured article as it tells you what you want to know without getting boring. I believe this article shows great skill in portraying the Rejistanian language TBF 21:19, 28 Dec 2004 (GMT)
  2. After re-reading the expanded article, I have decided it is worthy of a 'for' vote. Well written.Liverpool England 07:48, 8 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Oppose


Neutral

  1. I am the writer of this article and would like to see it as FAC. However I will not vote for myself :) ~ Rejistania 22:21, 28 Dec 2004 (GMT)


Comments/Questions

  • Its nice but it could be expanded a bit. Perhaps some words on how it is used in Rejistania (and perhaps abroad)? What kind of groups... it is used in formal occasions, how does it relate to other languages in the country? That sort of thing. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 13:17, 30 Dec 2004 (GMT)
  • While I feel that the article is well-written, I believe it can be improved and would like to see it as a future FAC, but not right now. - Liverpool England|My Talk page 05:01, 30 Dec 2004 (GMT)
  • Question about the article, how in the word to Rejistanians get by on three tenses? There are ways of differentiating the limited past from the imperfect past and such, right? Zoogies| ζtalk 23:51, 8 Jan 2005 (GMT)
    • Many languages have similar tense system. See Wikipedia:Grammatical aspect for some examples of how various languages represent the aspect. -- Wilem Engelking 13:11, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT)
    • There is the possibility to express duration by 'jet (example: I was drawing when Syku came: Xe'la'niva'jet, Syku mi'la'isa'han la). the other thing is that most conlangs, intended for the use of a large group of people have a rather simple grammar. Esperanto and Bahasa Indonesia are examples for that.