Difference between revisions of "Talk:Saharistan War"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Well, I think I finally edited it enough times to get it right for once.)
(Added my opinion)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Thanks to [[Tannenmille]] for nominating my article as a Featured Article Candidate.  SUPPORT: I hereby add my own vote in favor of becoming a Featured Article.
 
Thanks to [[Tannenmille]] for nominating my article as a Featured Article Candidate.  SUPPORT: I hereby add my own vote in favor of becoming a Featured Article.
  
<h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (2/0/0) </h3>
+
<h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (2/0/1) </h3>
 
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
 
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
  
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
'''Neutral'''
 
'''Neutral'''
#
+
# Why is the character infobox used? It incorrectly puts the article in Category: Characters. If that was fixed I'd definitely vote for it, as it's a great article. [[User:Ceorana|Ceorana]]|[[User talk:Ceorana|<small>Φ</small>]] 00:03, 21 October 2005 (GMT)
  
 
'''Comments/Questions'''
 
'''Comments/Questions'''

Revision as of 20:03, 20 October 2005

--The Saharistan War Talk Page--

Thank you for reading the Saharistan War Wiki article. Comments and constructive criticism are welcomed. -- Halberdgardia, 9/7, 6:36 CST

Thanks to Tannenmille for nominating my article as a Featured Article Candidate. SUPPORT: I hereby add my own vote in favor of becoming a Featured Article.

Saharistan War FAC Vote (2/0/1)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

  1. Self-vote Halberdgardia | Talk 23:37, 7 September 2005 (GMT)
  2. SWC-vote Tannenmille 11:27, 13 September 2005 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

  1. Why is the character infobox used? It incorrectly puts the article in Category: Characters. If that was fixed I'd definitely vote for it, as it's a great article. Ceorana|Φ 00:03, 21 October 2005 (GMT)

Comments/Questions