Talk:Scolopendra

Just an idea, but maybe the whole Scolopendra history could get its own entry. That way the article is less long and the 'basic' information gets more space. You should still refer to it of course :) Knoot 21:33, 3 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Done. --Scolopendra 23:58, 13 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Scolopendra FAC Vote (2/0/0)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. Very informative, extremely well written and organized. A clear example of some of NSWiki's best work. Khen 14:52, 14 Feb 2005 (GMT)
2. Freod 23:37, 14 Feb 2005 (GMT)
3. Mikhail 20:55, 27 Feb 2005 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments/Questions