Difference between revisions of "Talk:The East Pacific"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
| − | # | + | #I don't think this article meets the standard of "one of the finest examples of NSwiki's work." There's a lot that could be said about the East Pacific, and this article doesn't do it justice in my opinion. Is The East Pacific a subject that could get a featured article on it? Yes. Does the article at present qualify it for featured status? No. (Summary of opinion shamelessly stolen from Goobs CACE comment) --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 13:42, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)--Goobergunch|? 17:38, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT) |
| − | + | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
# | # | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 28 October 2004
the East Pacific FAC Vote (1/0/0)
- Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --Goobergunch
Support
Oppose
- I don't think this article meets the standard of "one of the finest examples of NSwiki's work." There's a lot that could be said about the East Pacific, and this article doesn't do it justice in my opinion. Is The East Pacific a subject that could get a featured article on it? Yes. Does the article at present qualify it for featured status? No. (Summary of opinion shamelessly stolen from Goobs CACE comment) -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 13:42, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)--Goobergunch|? 17:38, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Neutral
Comments/Questions
