Difference between revisions of "Talk:United Nations"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Well, I just added it to those categories, figured it can be removed if someone comes up with better categories. Now that I think about it, I'm not exactly sure about ''Category:Roleplaying'' (well, the UN forum seems to be somewhat IC), but the UN does have a major part in gameplay (invasions etc), so I think it should be kept in ''Category:Gameplaying''. -- [[User:Crimmer|Crimmer]] 16:43, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT) | :Well, I just added it to those categories, figured it can be removed if someone comes up with better categories. Now that I think about it, I'm not exactly sure about ''Category:Roleplaying'' (well, the UN forum seems to be somewhat IC), but the UN does have a major part in gameplay (invasions etc), so I think it should be kept in ''Category:Gameplaying''. -- [[User:Crimmer|Crimmer]] 16:43, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] thinks its got a valid place in both forums. Provided, of course, that the entry also reflects that. |
Revision as of 13:40, 4 October 2004
The UN needs its own category, but whether it also should be removed from Category:Roleplaying and Category:Gameplaying I'll leave to the site admins. --Frisbeeteria 16:19, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Well, I just added it to those categories, figured it can be removed if someone comes up with better categories. Now that I think about it, I'm not exactly sure about Category:Roleplaying (well, the UN forum seems to be somewhat IC), but the UN does have a major part in gameplay (invasions etc), so I think it should be kept in Category:Gameplaying. -- Crimmer 16:43, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Knoot thinks its got a valid place in both forums. Provided, of course, that the entry also reflects that.