Difference between revisions of "Talk:United Nations"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) (The United Nations is now a NSwiki:Featured article) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | === {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (5/0/0) === | + | === {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (5/0/0) (''Closed'') === |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (~<nowiki>~~</nowiki>~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (~<nowiki>~~</nowiki>~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
| − | # | + | # Voting is closed. The United Nations is now a [[NSwiki:Featured article|Featured article]] [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 23:07, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT) |
Revision as of 19:07, 6 January 2005
United Nations FAC Vote (5/0/0) (Closed)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 11:37, 14 Nov 2004 (GMT) I feel this page is rather central to a lot of good links that 'belong' to it as well as giving a decent description of the NSUN.
- Obviously I would support this as a Feature (as I wrote much of it) → Fris Θtalk 16:51, 14 Nov 2004 (GMT)
- I will present a justification for for this advocation of support, upon a contrary given reason posed by another. ℜechze|♞talk 03:57, 6 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- The article seems to be very well-written and neutral. It also has many useful links and talks about something very important to NS gameplay. So, yes, I think it deserves to be featured. User:Hell Bovines
- No need to repeat the points above. I agree. --Nevareion 13:04, 17 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- This article is very informative about the UN and manages to stay at a neutral disposition throughout. TBF 10:39, 3 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments/Questions
- Voting is closed. The United Nations is now a Featured article → Fris Θtalk 23:07, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)
