Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ceorana"
Gruenberg2 (Talk | contribs) (Re: clean-up of violet: explaining that, as the article is part of NS 'folk culture', clean-up may not be necessary.) |
Gruenberg2 (Talk | contribs) (Replying to Ceorana's point on User talk:Gruenberg2#Re: Re: clean-up of [[violet|my talk page: even so, this is a special exception.) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I have removed the clean-up tag from [[violet]]. I believe that this constitutes a part of NS lore, and as such the admitted irregularity of the article is acceptable. I have commented as such on [[NSwiki:Cleanup]]. If you still believe clean-up is required, perhaps we could discuss it first: we don't want to be ping-ponging the tag in and out of the article.[[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 20:33, 6 November 2005 (GMT) | I have removed the clean-up tag from [[violet]]. I believe that this constitutes a part of NS lore, and as such the admitted irregularity of the article is acceptable. I have commented as such on [[NSwiki:Cleanup]]. If you still believe clean-up is required, perhaps we could discuss it first: we don't want to be ping-ponging the tag in and out of the article.[[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 20:33, 6 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | :I don't see what can be cleaned up. It's taken from elsewhere, and I don't see how quoted statements can be changed. Are we going to change each one to 'according to TSM, "..."'? I agree fully with your keenness to clean-up NSwiki: but I believe this article represents a special, allowable exception, similar to the [[Hall of Ex-Nations]]. There are many other articles on [[NSwiki:Cleanup|the cleanup page]] more in need of attention.[[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 02:21, 7 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 22:21, 6 November 2005
Introduction
Welcome to User:Ceorana talk! Feel free to post whatever you want to say! (Oh, and sign everything with four tildes (~~~~) so we know who you are!) Ceorana|Φ 02:51, 20 October 2005 (GMT)
FAC votes
When voting on an featured article candidate, or in any vote, you need to update the vote tally manually. In this case, you didn't, so there were no votes 'for' recorded in the tally.Gruenberg2 07:45, 20 October 2005 (GMT)
Will remember to do in the future. Thanks! Ceorana|Φ 21:27, 20 October 2005 (GMT)
Re: clean-up of violet
I have removed the clean-up tag from violet. I believe that this constitutes a part of NS lore, and as such the admitted irregularity of the article is acceptable. I have commented as such on NSwiki:Cleanup. If you still believe clean-up is required, perhaps we could discuss it first: we don't want to be ping-ponging the tag in and out of the article.Gruen2alk 20:33, 6 November 2005 (GMT)
- I don't see what can be cleaned up. It's taken from elsewhere, and I don't see how quoted statements can be changed. Are we going to change each one to 'according to TSM, "..."'? I agree fully with your keenness to clean-up NSwiki: but I believe this article represents a special, allowable exception, similar to the Hall of Ex-Nations. There are many other articles on the cleanup page more in need of attention.Gruen2alk 02:21, 7 November 2005 (GMT)
