Difference between revisions of "Wank-power optimum"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Wank-power optimum''' is part of the [[Wank-power theorem]]. It is, theoretically, a shifting optimum of [[wank]] and [[power]]. The optimum situation for a nation is to make claims regarding power that are so big that they are just not ignored, while everyone in the same situation claiming anything more powerful would be ignored. At this point, any marginal increase in the claim of existing power would not increase but decrease a nations power through the use of [[IGNORE]]. | The '''Wank-power optimum''' is part of the [[Wank-power theorem]]. It is, theoretically, a shifting optimum of [[wank]] and [[power]]. The optimum situation for a nation is to make claims regarding power that are so big that they are just not ignored, while everyone in the same situation claiming anything more powerful would be ignored. At this point, any marginal increase in the claim of existing power would not increase but decrease a nations power through the use of [[IGNORE]]. | ||
| − | This optimum is not an “objective value” that is the same for everyone. [[OOC]] reasons and roleplaying ability heavily affect this. About a player who successfully balances near the wank-power optimum: "[He] rips off the wankiest science fiction [he] can find, while being accepted as existing | + | This optimum is not an “objective value” that is the same for everyone. [[OOC]] reasons and roleplaying ability heavily affect this. About a player who successfully balances near the wank-power optimum: "[He] rips off the wankiest science fiction [he] can find, while being accepted as existing ... [because he knows] what a 'paragraph' is." |
Some nations can get away with roleplaying a God, a personification of evil or an Elven Queen with many gravships purely by merit of other players accepting it for whatever reason whereas other would be ignored for claiming exactly the same. Roleplaying ability, likeability and such heavily weigh in here. | Some nations can get away with roleplaying a God, a personification of evil or an Elven Queen with many gravships purely by merit of other players accepting it for whatever reason whereas other would be ignored for claiming exactly the same. Roleplaying ability, likeability and such heavily weigh in here. | ||
[[Category:Roleplaying]] | [[Category:Roleplaying]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:58, 29 January 2005
The Wank-power optimum is part of the Wank-power theorem. It is, theoretically, a shifting optimum of wank and power. The optimum situation for a nation is to make claims regarding power that are so big that they are just not ignored, while everyone in the same situation claiming anything more powerful would be ignored. At this point, any marginal increase in the claim of existing power would not increase but decrease a nations power through the use of IGNORE.
This optimum is not an “objective value” that is the same for everyone. OOC reasons and roleplaying ability heavily affect this. About a player who successfully balances near the wank-power optimum: "[He] rips off the wankiest science fiction [he] can find, while being accepted as existing ... [because he knows] what a 'paragraph' is."
Some nations can get away with roleplaying a God, a personification of evil or an Elven Queen with many gravships purely by merit of other players accepting it for whatever reason whereas other would be ignored for claiming exactly the same. Roleplaying ability, likeability and such heavily weigh in here.
