Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tourism in Alamein"
(addition) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
With respect to the advertisement style: [[NSwiki:NPOV]]. With respect to the images and length, these images can be easily resized and hosted on photobucket without losing value. It is up to this site's administration, however, and if they have no problem then it is fine with me. --[[User:Helvetic Confederation|Helvetic Confederation]] 01:02, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT) | With respect to the advertisement style: [[NSwiki:NPOV]]. With respect to the images and length, these images can be easily resized and hosted on photobucket without losing value. It is up to this site's administration, however, and if they have no problem then it is fine with me. --[[User:Helvetic Confederation|Helvetic Confederation]] 01:02, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | :''"If this is too large, how large would the base Alamein article be if I added this? It's probably organizationally better to keep it seperate for easy reading."''. This is what I had meant. I think it is fine to be as a seperate article in the way that you had expressed | ||
| + | |||
| + | :''"It is up to this site's administration, however, and if they have no problem then it is fine with me."''. It really is not. It is up to the community. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :However, I ''personally'' would concur that this does not conform to NPOV, and probably should be rendered more encyclopaedic, ie. as opposed to beinng in the form of an advertisement, in the form of an encyclopaedic article. Moreover, if this exists at an external location ''I'' think it would be useful to be linked to from the article. Regarding the images, maybe they could just be linked to, or resized to quite small sizes as was suggested by Helvetic Confederation so as the make the page neater. —[[User:Rechze|'''Rechze''']] • [[User talk:Rechze|(talk)]] 10:54, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 06:54, 13 January 2005
No complaints with the article, but perhaps you should have a small footnote attributing copyrights to cover your back should a complaint arise. IdioC- エドの狂いtalk 19:24, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Why is this a separate page and not a part of your main Alamein page? Also, the way this page is written reads more like an advertisement rather than an informative article.
Helvetic Confederation 04:12, 12 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- Personally it seems too large, especially with all of the large pictures to be part of the main article, just out of convenience. Rechze • (talk) 10:27, 12 Jan 2005 (GMT)
If this is too large, how large would the base Alamein article be if I added this? It's probably organizationally better to keep it seperate for easy reading. Unless the modern intenet user is too lazy to click a link... Also, it's like an advertisement because that is the form in which it is presented - deliberately. Alamein 20:01, 12 Jan 2005 (GMT)
With respect to the advertisement style: NSwiki:NPOV. With respect to the images and length, these images can be easily resized and hosted on photobucket without losing value. It is up to this site's administration, however, and if they have no problem then it is fine with me. --Helvetic Confederation 01:02, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- "If this is too large, how large would the base Alamein article be if I added this? It's probably organizationally better to keep it seperate for easy reading.". This is what I had meant. I think it is fine to be as a seperate article in the way that you had expressed
- "It is up to this site's administration, however, and if they have no problem then it is fine with me.". It really is not. It is up to the community.
- However, I personally would concur that this does not conform to NPOV, and probably should be rendered more encyclopaedic, ie. as opposed to beinng in the form of an advertisement, in the form of an encyclopaedic article. Moreover, if this exists at an external location I think it would be useful to be linked to from the article. Regarding the images, maybe they could just be linked to, or resized to quite small sizes as was suggested by Helvetic Confederation so as the make the page neater. —Rechze • (talk) 10:54, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT)
