Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fodmodmadtol"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m |
|||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (3/0/4) </h3> | |
| − | + | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | |
| − | + | '''Support''' | |
| + | #Self-nomination. I think it's nifty. :P [[User:Fodski|Fodski]] 01:25, 3 May 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | # It's good enough for me. Not perfect - where it's not disordered it's generic - but not enough to dissuade me from thinking it worthy of feature. [[Special:Contributions/Gruenberg2|<font color="blue">~</font>]][[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 10:23, 6 September 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Nice page. No issue with it, and Fod's a great RPer. Deserves a feature. [[User:Khrrck|Khrrck]] 23:57, 11 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose''' | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Neutral''' | ||
| + | #Well-written, but needs more information to tie everything else together; it's a bit confusing. '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#000080">Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#ff0000">rant</font>]] <font color=white>\</font> [[Special:Contributions/Ceorana|<font color=white>rave</font>]]''''' 02:46, 3 May 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | #Agree with the above, though I think a better term would be "chaotic". Perhaps if the sections were rearranged so they moved more naturally from one to the next it would help. [[User:Kajal|Kajal]] 01:14, 30 July 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | #Solid start but it needs a fair bit of improvement in transitions from one subject to another, and a few of the sentences give me the feeling you're heading off on tangents (re: what Ceo said)... otherwise, not half bad. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 05:13, 13 October 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | #It's a nice article, but it blatently contradicts itself at times. A government cannot be both socialist and libertarian. That's an oxymoron [[User:Lightman|Lightman]] 01:22, 16 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | #:Yes it can. It can be socialist on economic issues and libertarian on social issues. See also [[Wikipedia:Anarcho-socialism]]. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 01:43, 16 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
| + | *Why is the article named Fodmodmadtol but addressed in the lead section as "Fod" and its extended name? '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#000080">Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#ff0000">rant</font>]] <font color=white>\</font> [[Special:Contributions/Ceorana|<font color=white>rave</font>]]''''' 02:46, 3 May 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | **As far as I know, "Fod" is an abbreviation used by those who don't want to bother spelling (or saying) "Fodmodmadtol" every time they want to refer to the nation. It could be replaced with "Fodmodmadtol" but that would make the article more difficult to read - remember, kids, long words bad! [[User:Khrrck|Khrrck]] 23:57, 11 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:27, 2 January 2007
Fodmodmadtol FAC Vote (3/0/4)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- Self-nomination. I think it's nifty. :P Fodski 01:25, 3 May 2006 (GMT)
- It's good enough for me. Not perfect - where it's not disordered it's generic - but not enough to dissuade me from thinking it worthy of feature. ~Gruen2alk 10:23, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
- Nice page. No issue with it, and Fod's a great RPer. Deserves a feature. Khrrck 23:57, 11 November 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
- Well-written, but needs more information to tie everything else together; it's a bit confusing. Ceo \ rant \ rave 02:46, 3 May 2006 (GMT)
- Agree with the above, though I think a better term would be "chaotic". Perhaps if the sections were rearranged so they moved more naturally from one to the next it would help. Kajal 01:14, 30 July 2006 (GMT)
- Solid start but it needs a fair bit of improvement in transitions from one subject to another, and a few of the sentences give me the feeling you're heading off on tangents (re: what Ceo said)... otherwise, not half bad. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 05:13, 13 October 2006 (GMT)
- It's a nice article, but it blatently contradicts itself at times. A government cannot be both socialist and libertarian. That's an oxymoron Lightman 01:22, 16 November 2006 (GMT)
- Yes it can. It can be socialist on economic issues and libertarian on social issues. See also Wikipedia:Anarcho-socialism. Ceoranta 01:43, 16 November 2006 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
- Why is the article named Fodmodmadtol but addressed in the lead section as "Fod" and its extended name? Ceo \ rant \ rave 02:46, 3 May 2006 (GMT)
- As far as I know, "Fod" is an abbreviation used by those who don't want to bother spelling (or saying) "Fodmodmadtol" every time they want to refer to the nation. It could be replaced with "Fodmodmadtol" but that would make the article more difficult to read - remember, kids, long words bad! Khrrck 23:57, 11 November 2006 (GMT)
