Difference between revisions of "Talk:Collaboration"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) m |
(regarding Template:inclusion: keep; modifying capitals use in comment by User:Krrck; small reordering of comments for better understanding of the discussion/changes to degree of indentation) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is blank. It's not even a stub. | This page is blank. It's not even a stub. | ||
− | : | + | ::''However'', it is regarding a member of the Halls of Memory. Thus I would propose adding it to ''Requests for expanded articles'', instead of removing it altogether. That is to say: '''Keep'''. [[User:Rechze|'''Rechze''']] • [[User talk:Rechze|(talk)]] 04:43, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT) |
− | |||
− | ::I did notice the unsigned comment, by the way. I didn't re-edit because I was afraid of making too many unnecessary edits. Possibly not a good argument, but at least I have one. --[[User:Khrrck|Khrrck]] 04:27, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT) | + | This talk page note is unsigned. It's not even a notification of adding an {inclusion} tag. If you're going to list something for [[NSwiki:deletion|deletion]], at least make it a little bit easy on the sysops by following [[NSwiki:deletion policy]]. And sign your talk page posts, please. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 04:15, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT) |
+ | |||
+ | :I think what we have here is a little mutal hostility. Please cut me some slack; I'm not that experienced, and I only saw the article about how to tag an article's talk page '''after''' I had made this edit. Please remember that I'm relatively new, and can't be expected to have memorized all the rules yet. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I did notice the unsigned comment, by the way. I didn't re-edit because I was afraid of making too many unnecessary edits. Possibly not a good argument, but at least I have one. --[[User:Khrrck|Khrrck]] 04:27, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
:<nowiki>=== PageToBeDeleted [[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|(add to this discussion)]]===</nowiki> | :<nowiki>=== PageToBeDeleted [[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|(add to this discussion)]]===</nowiki> | ||
:<nowiki>{{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}</nowiki> | :<nowiki>{{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}</nowiki> | ||
This bit goes on the page [[NSwiki:Deletion]], and the '''PageToBeDeleted''' bits get replaced with the actual article name. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 04:33, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT) | This bit goes on the page [[NSwiki:Deletion]], and the '''PageToBeDeleted''' bits get replaced with the actual article name. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 04:33, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT) |
Revision as of 00:43, 6 January 2005
This page is blank. It's not even a stub.
This talk page note is unsigned. It's not even a notification of adding an {inclusion} tag. If you're going to list something for deletion, at least make it a little bit easy on the sysops by following NSwiki:deletion policy. And sign your talk page posts, please. → Fris Θtalk 04:15, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- I think what we have here is a little mutal hostility. Please cut me some slack; I'm not that experienced, and I only saw the article about how to tag an article's talk page after I had made this edit. Please remember that I'm relatively new, and can't be expected to have memorized all the rules yet.
- I did notice the unsigned comment, by the way. I didn't re-edit because I was afraid of making too many unnecessary edits. Possibly not a good argument, but at least I have one. --Khrrck 04:27, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- === PageToBeDeleted [[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|(add to this discussion)]]===
- {{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}
This bit goes on the page NSwiki:Deletion, and the PageToBeDeleted bits get replaced with the actual article name. → Fris Θtalk 04:33, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)