Difference between revisions of "Talk:English"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(my views) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* I have now completely reorganised the paragraphs into a simple table. Everyone, please check for mistakes and perhaps expand the descriptions - I didnt have much to go on for some nations from the previous version. If anyone would like to format the table to look nicer, be my guest - just please dont undo everything Ive done. --[[User:Arturria|Arturria]] 17:07, 19 Mar 2005 (GMT) | * I have now completely reorganised the paragraphs into a simple table. Everyone, please check for mistakes and perhaps expand the descriptions - I didnt have much to go on for some nations from the previous version. If anyone would like to format the table to look nicer, be my guest - just please dont undo everything Ive done. --[[User:Arturria|Arturria]] 17:07, 19 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
** Looks good; great work Arturria! It'll just have to be kept an eye on now to ensure that it stays in alphabetical order. I just hope the source doesn't look so "complicated" that it discourage newcomers from adding to it.<br>On another point, should there really be nations in the table that don't have NSWiki pages? Seems a bit pointless to me. --[[User:Eddie|Eddie]] 22:52, 20 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ** Looks good; great work Arturria! It'll just have to be kept an eye on now to ensure that it stays in alphabetical order. I just hope the source doesn't look so "complicated" that it discourage newcomers from adding to it.<br>On another point, should there really be nations in the table that don't have NSWiki pages? Seems a bit pointless to me. --[[User:Eddie|Eddie]] 22:52, 20 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | **Thank you. Though theres little that can be done about the source as far as I know, its just the Wiki table markup. The nations of [[Heiterland]] and [[Mallorcana]] are my own, I just havent got round to making articles for them yet. I included them in a paragraph about my main nation prior to the alphabetisation and feel that it would be rather oddd to remove information when theres nothing wrong with it. The way I see it, this page catalogs the use of English on NationStates, so its perfectly fine to include nations that dont have their own articles yet. --[[User:Arturria|Arturria]] 19:34, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:34, 22 March 2005
Alphabetise the list of nations
- Hello. Does anyone else feel that we should arrange the list of English-speaking nations into some sort of table with alphabetical ordering, with the details and explanations in a second column perhaps? (Arturria 22:59, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT))
- I tried organising it on several types of use, but other people seem to just ignore it. :/ Will organise it a little bit further today. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 10:40, 19 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- I have now completely reorganised the paragraphs into a simple table. Everyone, please check for mistakes and perhaps expand the descriptions - I didnt have much to go on for some nations from the previous version. If anyone would like to format the table to look nicer, be my guest - just please dont undo everything Ive done. --Arturria 17:07, 19 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Looks good; great work Arturria! It'll just have to be kept an eye on now to ensure that it stays in alphabetical order. I just hope the source doesn't look so "complicated" that it discourage newcomers from adding to it.
On another point, should there really be nations in the table that don't have NSWiki pages? Seems a bit pointless to me. --Eddie 22:52, 20 Mar 2005 (GMT) - Thank you. Though theres little that can be done about the source as far as I know, its just the Wiki table markup. The nations of Heiterland and Mallorcana are my own, I just havent got round to making articles for them yet. I included them in a paragraph about my main nation prior to the alphabetisation and feel that it would be rather oddd to remove information when theres nothing wrong with it. The way I see it, this page catalogs the use of English on NationStates, so its perfectly fine to include nations that dont have their own articles yet. --Arturria 19:34, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Looks good; great work Arturria! It'll just have to be kept an eye on now to ensure that it stays in alphabetical order. I just hope the source doesn't look so "complicated" that it discourage newcomers from adding to it.
