Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Rivers"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(NSwiki:Deletion - procedural nomination)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''Procedural nomination. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)''
 +
 
I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has ''one'' entry. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT)
 
I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has ''one'' entry. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT)
 
:I concur. [[User:Rechze|Rechze]] &bull; [[User talk:Rechze|(talk)]] 06:19, 22 Feb 2005 (GMT)
 
:I concur. [[User:Rechze|Rechze]] &bull; [[User talk:Rechze|(talk)]] 06:19, 22 Feb 2005 (GMT)
 +
*'''Very weak keep'''.  Now contains two articles. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)

Revision as of 21:33, 9 March 2005

Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)

I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has one entry. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT)

I concur. Rechze(talk) 06:19, 22 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • Very weak keep. Now contains two articles. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)