Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Rivers"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(NSwiki:Deletion - procedural nomination) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''Procedural nomination. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)'' | ||
+ | |||
I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has ''one'' entry. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT) | I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has ''one'' entry. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT) | ||
:I concur. [[User:Rechze|Rechze]] • [[User talk:Rechze|(talk)]] 06:19, 22 Feb 2005 (GMT) | :I concur. [[User:Rechze|Rechze]] • [[User talk:Rechze|(talk)]] 06:19, 22 Feb 2005 (GMT) | ||
+ | *'''Very weak keep'''. Now contains two articles. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT) |
Revision as of 21:33, 9 March 2005
Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has one entry. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT)
- Very weak keep. Now contains two articles. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)