NSWiki:Arbitration/Eurasia

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

I've received communications from both parties in this case, and I'd like to hear it in a bit more open of a forum, as I think the question of plagiarism should be discussed in such a way as to form a more uniform policy. There is very little documentation on the wiki about this case (which is poor form, in my opinion), and it's really hard for me to figure out what is going on without a thorough view of editing histories - I'll have time to do that in a couple days, but not now. Therefore, I'm opening this page for such a discussion. I'm not really concerned about formatting here, to be honest; just trying to figure out what's going on. --User:Goobergunch|? 07:59, 8 March 2007 (GMT)

Articles involved in this dispute: Eurasian Broadcasting Group, EBG World

Statements and comments

I'd like to start off by thanking Goobergunch for allowing me to voice my concerns on the wiki itself, rather than having to make a big deal out of it elsewhere. Now, I will be more than willing to admit that I have made errors - who hasn't? All I want to protest is the fact that I was banned for an event that was never clearly defined, and I was banned for a rather trival offence. I apologise sincerely, once more, for circumnavigating the ban. I feel that Pacitalia, if he were to have blocked me, ought to have provided more warning. When I was blocked, I had no prior warning, and after talking to Pacitalia, I was even more confused. Had he just provided a simple example of this, I would have changed it forthwith and apologised. I humbly request that the ban be lifted. -- Eurasia 205.221.1.69 17:26, 8 March 2007 (GMT)

Evidence

Evidence by Pacitalia

Evidence by Eurasia

My first piece of evidence stating that Pacitalia is applying a double standard in his block, thus making it unjust and violating Article XX of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Compare this to the PBC's core values.

If Pacitalia can get away with plagiarism, why should I be blocked, even if you assume that I did plagiarise?

Evidence by third parties

Transcribed from Special:Log/block:

  • 23:00, 5 March 2007 Pacitalia blocked "Eurasia (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (Evading ban, second offence)
  • 22:59, 5 March 2007 Pacitalia blocked "12.216.107.196 (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (Evading ban, second offence)
  • 19:31, 4 March 2007 Pacitalia blocked "Eurasia (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 months (Evading ban, User:Eurasia)
  • 19:26, 4 March 2007 Pacitalia blocked "72.232.214.186 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 months (Evading ban, User:Eurasia)
  • 10:45, 4 March 2007 Pacitalia blocked "Eurasia (contribs)" with an expiry time of 2 weeks (Wikiplagiarism)
  • 10:44, 4 March 2007 Pacitalia blocked "Eurasia (contribs)" with an expiry time of 2 weeks (Wikiplagiarism)
  • 10:44, 4 March 2007 Pacitalia blocked "Eurasia (contribs)" with an expiry time of 2 weeks (Wikiplagiarism)
  • 10:43, 4 March 2007 Pacitalia unblocked Eurasia (contribs) (Changing ban length)
  • 10:42, 4 March 2007 Pacitalia unblocked #745 (Changing ban length)
  • 09:59, 4 March 2007 Pacitalia blocked "Eurasia (contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 month (Provisional ban (length subject to change): plagiarism, second offence)

--User:Goobergunch|? 08:24, 8 March 2007 (GMT)