Difference between revisions of "NSWiki:Deletion"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Spelling problem)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
=== [[Eranmane]] ([[Talk:Eranmane|add to this discussion]]) ===
 
=== [[Eranmane]] ([[Talk:Eranmane|add to this discussion]]) ===
{{Talk:Eranmame}}
+
{{Talk:Eranmane}}
  
 
I just want it to go away.
 
I just want it to go away.

Revision as of 17:38, 15 March 2006

These pages are candidates for deletion by consensus. Please discuss each article on the appropriate article talk page - only edit this page to add or remove deletion candidates.

See NSwiki:Deletion policy for other types of deletion, including speedy deletion criteria.

To request that an article be deleted, please put an {{inclusion}} tag at the top of the article, post your reason for deletion on the article's talk page, and put the following under the current date (if the current date is not listed, post it below other dates):

=== [[PageToBeDeleted]] ([[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|add to this discussion]]) ===
{{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}

where PageToBeDeleted is the name of the page you wish to delete. If the article is not posted to this page, the sysops may not see it and the article will not get deleted!

21 February 2006

Age of imperialism (Defuniak) (add to this discussion)

Procedural nomination - put up for deletion by User:Macabees. Personally, I'd say delete as nonsense. Gruen2alk 01:31, 21 February 2006 (GMT)

The author did not give the date of when this particular era. --Constantina 14:34, 2 March 2006 (GMT)

I'd say contact the author and ask what he intends to do with this. Ceo \ rant \ rave 02:11, 16 March 2006 (GMT)

The author was anonymous, and under that IP made only this single contribution. Nothing links here (nor to the redirect page), and there is no Defuniak article. The nation Defuniak doesn't exist (or no longer exists). This article looks a lot like nonsense. Seems like a valid candidate for deletion. Aridd 02:10, 7 November 2006 (GMT)

25 February 2006

Univeristy of Gondolin (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed by Goobergunch|? on 08:49, 16 March 2006 (GMT), as there was consensus to keep the article. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article.

Nothing but a picture with no description, I think it should be deleted. --swilatia 17:45, 25 February 2006 (GMT)

A good photo page needs a good description. I can't make out what this building is. --Constantina 14:23, 2 March 2006 (GMT) :Delete, but merge the picture with Greater Tomania. Gruen2alk 14:17, 7 March 2006 (GMT)

Content added; opinion changed to keep. Gruen2alk 01:59, 16 March 2006 (GMT)

This is just my assumption, but I’d assume that since the page is called “University of Gondolin” that the picture, in turn, would be the University itself. But then again, who knows.

i would say Keep now, as it now has a desciripition. --swilatia 23:05, 15 March 2006 (GMT)

15 March 2006

Eranmane (add to this discussion)

Delete the page

This is Eranmane, I've put a {{delete}} tag on my page, because of Eranmane ceasing to exist.

I hope it will be deleted...

I just want it to go away.