Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bad form"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: There are plenty of actions in Gameplaying that could also be considered [[Bad form]]. I think the article is imcomplete and should be fleshed out instead of just removing the category tag. To think otherwise would be a sign of Bad Form, now wouldn't it? '':: grin ::'' [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 04:48, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT) | : There are plenty of actions in Gameplaying that could also be considered [[Bad form]]. I think the article is imcomplete and should be fleshed out instead of just removing the category tag. To think otherwise would be a sign of Bad Form, now wouldn't it? '':: grin ::'' [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 04:48, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Should be marked Stub in that case. I'll do that. --[[User:Khrrck|Khrrck]] 02:25, 20 Jan 2005 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 22:25, 19 January 2005
This seems like a wholly Roleplaying article and not a Gameplaying one. Perhaps Category:Gameplaying could be removed? --Khrrck 03:38, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- There are plenty of actions in Gameplaying that could also be considered Bad form. I think the article is imcomplete and should be fleshed out instead of just removing the category tag. To think otherwise would be a sign of Bad Form, now wouldn't it? :: grin :: → Fris Θtalk 04:48, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- Should be marked Stub in that case. I'll do that. --Khrrck 02:25, 20 Jan 2005 (GMT)