Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bad form"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: There are plenty of actions in Gameplaying that could also be considered [[Bad form]].  I think the article is imcomplete and should be fleshed out instead of just removing the category tag.  To think otherwise would be a sign of Bad Form, now wouldn't it? '':: grin ::'' [[User:Frisbeeteria|&rarr; Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|&Theta;<small>''talk''</small>]] 04:48, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)
 
: There are plenty of actions in Gameplaying that could also be considered [[Bad form]].  I think the article is imcomplete and should be fleshed out instead of just removing the category tag.  To think otherwise would be a sign of Bad Form, now wouldn't it? '':: grin ::'' [[User:Frisbeeteria|&rarr; Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|&Theta;<small>''talk''</small>]] 04:48, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)
 +
 +
: Should be marked Stub in that case. I'll do that. --[[User:Khrrck|Khrrck]] 02:25, 20 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 22:25, 19 January 2005

This seems like a wholly Roleplaying article and not a Gameplaying one. Perhaps Category:Gameplaying could be removed? --Khrrck 03:38, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)

There are plenty of actions in Gameplaying that could also be considered Bad form. I think the article is imcomplete and should be fleshed out instead of just removing the category tag. To think otherwise would be a sign of Bad Form, now wouldn't it? :: grin :: → Fris Θtalk 04:48, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Should be marked Stub in that case. I'll do that. --Khrrck 02:25, 20 Jan 2005 (GMT)