Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cold war"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(→[Pudding]) |
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It was you and M going it alone; GMC and L both publically disowned everything you were doing, and nothing was ever done under the auspice of SATO. I don't know why you're intent on dragging out a conflict that never ended because Jigoku disappeared, but I'd like to see your evidence that SATO did, in fact, support the rebels. Seeing as you are making the positive statement, the burden of proof is on those claiming something does exist. Lacking evidence, empiricism dictates that the purported fact is not. | It was you and M going it alone; GMC and L both publically disowned everything you were doing, and nothing was ever done under the auspice of SATO. I don't know why you're intent on dragging out a conflict that never ended because Jigoku disappeared, but I'd like to see your evidence that SATO did, in fact, support the rebels. Seeing as you are making the positive statement, the burden of proof is on those claiming something does exist. Lacking evidence, empiricism dictates that the purported fact is not. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Having no knowledge of any of the wars in question, I can say that the article mainly needs cleanup and spellcheck. I'd avoid phrases like ''lesser in gradeur and scope'', but apart from that it doesn't seem to draw any conclusions. All I see is reference examples and links, though links to the wars and not the nations would be more useful to the topic. [[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] 14:27, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 10:27, 10 October 2004
You know... when adding a NPOV tag it would be nice if you would present some actual evidence~. I'll give you some time to prevent said evidence before I will remove the tag. Knoot 13:28, 9 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Pudding
It was you and M going it alone; GMC and L both publically disowned everything you were doing, and nothing was ever done under the auspice of SATO. I don't know why you're intent on dragging out a conflict that never ended because Jigoku disappeared, but I'd like to see your evidence that SATO did, in fact, support the rebels. Seeing as you are making the positive statement, the burden of proof is on those claiming something does exist. Lacking evidence, empiricism dictates that the purported fact is not.
- Having no knowledge of any of the wars in question, I can say that the article mainly needs cleanup and spellcheck. I'd avoid phrases like lesser in gradeur and scope, but apart from that it doesn't seem to draw any conclusions. All I see is reference examples and links, though links to the wars and not the nations would be more useful to the topic. Frisbeeteria 14:27, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)
