Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dafitopiapolis"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Noting NPOV vote.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== {{PAGENAME}} NPOV Poll (2/0/0) ==
+
This page was the subject of an [[/NPOV/]] vote: the consensus was '''not neutral'''. [[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">~Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2</font>]] 23:43, 1 May 2006 (GMT)
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~</nowiki>~~<nowiki>~</nowiki>) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
+
 
+
'''Biased'''
+
# Article is clearly biased, but the nation owner could surely rephrase it to avoid the label.  I'd be delighted to change my vote to neutral or not biased, given the opportunity. [[User:Frisbeeteria|&rarr; Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|&Theta;<small>''talk''</small>]] 23:26, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT)
+
#Oh, so agreed. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 14:10, 30 Nov 2004 (GMT)
+
# You must be joking.  We do have a NPOV policy, right?  [[User:Ainulindalion|Ainulindalion]] 03:11, 3 Mar 2005 (GMT)
+
# Concur. [[User:Rechze|Rechze]] &bull; [[User talk:Rechze|(talk)]] 08:27, 4 Mar 2005 (GMT)
+
# Too late for me to pile on? [[User:Hack|Hack]] 08:46, 15 Mar 2005 (GMT)
+
 
+
'''Not Biased'''
+
#
+
 
+
'''Neutral / not clear'''
+
#
+
 
+
'''Comments/Questions'''
+
 
+
I have rephrased it slightly 'He now considers both organisations to be utterly corrupt' etc. So can the NPOV dispute be removed now?
+
The article needs tidying up still, which I am working on
+
-Dafi
+

Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 May 2006

This page was the subject of an NPOV vote: the consensus was not neutral. ~Gruen2 23:43, 1 May 2006 (GMT)