Talk:Gulden/Archive

Gulden/Archive FAC Vote (8/0/0)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. I think this deserves a chance to be featured. Since this is the only currency related article containing so much information on a monetary system and its history, I'd like to give it a shot. Tell me what you think. The Mystery Man 09:51, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
2. Seconded. It's a good and original article. Hogsweat 09:54, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
3. Support: a nice article on a relatively untouched subject. The only problem, if it does get featured, will be which bits to use, as most of the tables are too bulky. Gruen2alk 14:25, 7 March 2006 (GMT)
4. Support This is an excellent article on a currency, the standard to which I'm trying to build mine up to. Full support. Skinny87 16:42, 5 April 2006 (GMT)
5. Support Best currency article. Hope to see this as a featured article. United Island Empires 08:36, 6 May 2006 (GMT)
6. Support The best currency article among the "Major Currencies" (see controversy at Template_talk:Currencies), whose only competition is the Douro, but since I haven't read every article in the entire category, I can't say for sure it's best. Good mix of text and illustrations, but I'm not sure how many illustrations are original with the author. When I have time, I will go back and make a few minor spelling corrections. Clearly superior to my own text-only Denkmark. Sober Thought 03:53, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
7. Support per all above comments, but see note below. Ceo \ rant \ rave 04:00, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
8. Support as above, but you need to update your exchange rates. ;) (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 08:07, 1 October 2006 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments/Questions

• This article pertains to the currency of a nation that no longer exists, and will definitely not come back. Doesn't this qualify it for deletion or at least past-tensifying? Ceo \ rant \ rave 04:00, 21 June 2006 (GMT)

• I hope not deletion! Such fine work deserves a permanent home, even if the nation itself has vanished. I can see how a past-tense edit might be appropriate, and I would volunteer to do one if it reached featured article status. Sober Thought 04:13, 21 June 2006 (GMT)

• On the deletion comment, Pacitalia personally assured me all of my NSwiki work is allowed to remain, since I never done anything wrong here - in fact, I made this place better! Past-tensifying however, is something I agree with. The Mystery Man 09:30, 23 June 2006 (GMT) (Guffingford talking from beyond)

• • I would hope the article isn't deleted. I'm not personally concerned about tense. However, it may not be featured, at least for some time. ~Gruen2alk 10:26, 6 September 2006 (GMT)