Talk:Hall of Ex-Nations

Ya know, the hall being what is is, most of the entries are blatantly biased, and tend to overinflate some minor trolls whom people have had nasty experiences with.

On the other hand, it's technically quoting the people who wrote these entries.

In this context, does the neutral stance policy apply?

--Quintucket 02:36, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT)

value of NPOV in Ex-Nations?

Goober got most of these from a Forum topic. If he puts in a link, it's a quoted source, not NPOV, at least not as I see it. I've posted several pieces with my personal style showing in spades. I don't think we're trying to be as dry as Wikipedia - we don't have to be all things to all people. It's important to archive the bad with the good when it comes to making NationStates memories.

Besides, they're not around to argue, are they?  :p → Frisbeeteria Θtalk 02:51, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT)

"I don't think we're trying to be as dry as Wikipedia - we don't have to be all things to all people." <--- Oh goodie so it's okay then that the article I'm witing on Marathon while dry is more than a little caustic then. >:}

I think that I may try to tone down some of the overstatements of importance in some cases and at some point if nobody minds though.

--Quintucket 02:59, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Communist Mississippi

I've protected the page because of edit warring involving CM's player going nuts whenever somebody tries to change his version of his entry. As noted by myself in an edit summary, this page is for names and brief reasons for DEAT; more lengthy discussion of the nation should go to that nation's page. Therefore, irregardless of the merits of the case I feel that this is out of line. I'll review the actual merits of the case tomorrow. --Goobergunch|? 23:16, 13 Mar 2005 (GMT)

I already made it clear what compromise I'd accept, I posted it here, but it was edited away...

Fabusism2005 11:54 pm, March 13th, 2005 in the year of our Lord.