Difference between revisions of "Talk:Itinerate Tree Dweller/Archive"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#<s>One thing, and then I'll hop to agree. Even out the pictures. The intro is all over the place with bright, vivid eye-catches (which I liked), but the ending trails off into pure text. Otherwise, it is well written and actually coherent.</s> Nice work. [[User:Nairatsa|<font color="orange">Nairatsa </font>]][[User_talk:Nairatsa|<font color="Black">'' Complain/Compliment''</font>]] 22:54, 25 January 2006 (GMT) | #<s>One thing, and then I'll hop to agree. Even out the pictures. The intro is all over the place with bright, vivid eye-catches (which I liked), but the ending trails off into pure text. Otherwise, it is well written and actually coherent.</s> Nice work. [[User:Nairatsa|<font color="orange">Nairatsa </font>]][[User_talk:Nairatsa|<font color="Black">'' Complain/Compliment''</font>]] 22:54, 25 January 2006 (GMT) | ||
#Great article. Wonderful use of pictures and in-depth descriptions. [[Jey]] 00:32 31 January 2006 (GMT) | #Great article. Wonderful use of pictures and in-depth descriptions. [[Jey]] 00:32 31 January 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | #Very well done indeed. This would be a nice example to show to new nations. Support. [[User:Aridd|Aridd]] 14:40, 28 February 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' |
Revision as of 10:40, 28 February 2006
Itinerate Tree Dweller/Archive FAC Vote (6/0/1)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- Detailed, well-presented, plenty of interesting content. I have no reason to oppose this nomination.Gruen2alk 22:33, 10 November 2005 (GMT)
- Interesting article. Honestly, it's the best nation article I saw here. I support if I am supposed to do so. Smertios 16:00, 17 November 2005 (GMT)
- Wow. The pictures go along nicely with the prose. ~ Ceo rant (or rave) 18:27, November 20, 2005 (GMT)
- ITD For Featured Article! :-) (ITD 03:55, 27 November 2005 (GMT))
One thing, and then I'll hop to agree. Even out the pictures. The intro is all over the place with bright, vivid eye-catches (which I liked), but the ending trails off into pure text. Otherwise, it is well written and actually coherent.Nice work. Nairatsa Complain/Compliment 22:54, 25 January 2006 (GMT)- Great article. Wonderful use of pictures and in-depth descriptions. Jey 00:32 31 January 2006 (GMT)
- Very well done indeed. This would be a nice example to show to new nations. Support. Aridd 14:40, 28 February 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
- One of the things that bugs me is when players use their NS nation's description as their introductory paragraph, such as is the case here. No doubt, it is a great article, but I think an original introductory paragraph would make this article a lot better. Pacitalkia 01:13, 11 November 2005
Comments/Questions
- I assume this is a self-nomination? It would be nice to hear why you feel this should be featured. Nonetheless, I admire the article, and support it as such.Gruen2alk 22:33, 10 November 2005 (GMT)
- Yes, it is a self-nomination, because I felt I did a very decent job on the page. I encourage people to look at my page when looking for examples of what they can do with NSWiki. Pacitia, I am working on a new intro. (ITD 01:40, 11 November 2005 (GMT))
- Self-nomination or not, it's still a good article... Smertios 16:02, 17 November 2005 (GMT)