Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jambuula"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Gruenberg2 (Talk | contribs) (Explaining addition of {{inclusion}}: whilst some may feel this nation is 'historic', at present this article is insufficient.) |
(redirect) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This stub appears of little value, given that the [[East Pacific Treaty Organization|EPTO]] page states everything contained in it. As this is an ex-nation, I see little value in keeping it. ''However'', some members may feel this nation has 'historic' status, and in the light of a comment on the EPTO regarding 'the Jambuuland hostage incident' or some such, it may be possible to add to this article. However, in its present state, I do not see any point retaining it.[[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 03:41, 13 November 2005 (GMT) | This stub appears of little value, given that the [[East Pacific Treaty Organization|EPTO]] page states everything contained in it. As this is an ex-nation, I see little value in keeping it. ''However'', some members may feel this nation has 'historic' status, and in the light of a comment on the EPTO regarding 'the Jambuuland hostage incident' or some such, it may be possible to add to this article. However, in its present state, I do not see any point retaining it.[[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 03:41, 13 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * I vote '''redirect''' to [[East Pacific Treaty Organization]]. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 03:38, 24 December 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 23 December 2005
This stub appears of little value, given that the EPTO page states everything contained in it. As this is an ex-nation, I see little value in keeping it. However, some members may feel this nation has 'historic' status, and in the light of a comment on the EPTO regarding 'the Jambuuland hostage incident' or some such, it may be possible to add to this article. However, in its present state, I do not see any point retaining it.Gruen2alk 03:41, 13 November 2005 (GMT)
- I vote redirect to East Pacific Treaty Organization. --Goobergunch|? 03:38, 24 December 2005 (GMT)
