Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jey"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(→FAC: tentative support) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Support''' | '''Support''' | ||
| − | # | + | #I believe this article should be nominated for it's sheer brilance in quality writting. I feel that it deserves it's place in NSWiki history. I support as nominator. [[User:Nice Cool People|Nice Cool People]] 19:05, 24 February 2006 (GMT) |
| − | I believe this article should be nominated for it's sheer brilance in quality writting. I feel that it deserves it's place in NSWiki history. I support as nominator. [[User:Nice Cool People|Nice Cool People]] 19:05, 24 February 2006 (GMT) | + | |
| + | # ''Tentative'' support. I feel it's a good article, but has a few too many empty sections and first person references. Still deserves to be featured, though. [[Ceorana|<span style="background:navy; color:red;">'''–|––'''</span>]] '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#000080">Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#ff0000">rant</font>]]''''' 01:06, 25 February 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
# | # | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
| − | # | + | #Very good article, in my opinion, but still lacks structure, a large part being very irrelevent. If most of the '''Governement''' section is moved to a different article, then I will support nomination.[[User:Vuam and Isma|Vuam and Isma]] 19:53, 24 February 2006 (GMT) |
| − | Very good article, in my opinion, but still lacks structure, a large part being very irrelevent. If most of the '''Governement''' section is moved to a different article, then I will support nomination.[[User:Vuam and Isma|Vuam and Isma]] 19:53, 24 February 2006 (GMT) | + | |
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
Revision as of 21:06, 24 February 2006
Talk
Jey FAC Vote (1/0/1)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I believe this article should be nominated for it's sheer brilance in quality writting. I feel that it deserves it's place in NSWiki history. I support as nominator. Nice Cool People 19:05, 24 February 2006 (GMT)
- Tentative support. I feel it's a good article, but has a few too many empty sections and first person references. Still deserves to be featured, though. –|–– Ceo \ rant 01:06, 25 February 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
- Very good article, in my opinion, but still lacks structure, a large part being very irrelevent. If most of the Governement section is moved to a different article, then I will support nomination.Vuam and Isma 19:53, 24 February 2006 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
