Difference between revisions of "Talk:League of Empire Loyalists"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(comment) |
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) (explanation of edits) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* '''Comment'''. I have posted a request for a NationStates opinion on the [http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8578773&postcount=1 NationStates forums]. This request was made in my official capacity as NSwiki Founder. I will not be voting Keep or Delete at this time. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 01:16, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT) | * '''Comment'''. I have posted a request for a NationStates opinion on the [http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8578773&postcount=1 NationStates forums]. This request was made in my official capacity as NSwiki Founder. I will not be voting Keep or Delete at this time. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 01:16, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * I've replaced a blatantly POV description of the Caelta complaint with a more accurate rendition of what has actually been reported in the NS Moderation forum. I also removed the link, on my authority of NSwiki sysop, as it does in fact contain sexual content, and we haven't been allowing that here. I will of course accept consensus rulings in this matter, and the link can be found in the History pages. Until consensus is reached, I would request that the link not be added back in to the page. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 23:48, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 19:48, 1 April 2005
The link on this particular article has been banned on NS, I thought NSwiki would do the same despite it being a seperate entity. -ITD-
- Comment. I have posted a request for a NationStates opinion on the NationStates forums. This request was made in my official capacity as NSwiki Founder. I will not be voting Keep or Delete at this time. --Goobergunch|? 01:16, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT)
- I've replaced a blatantly POV description of the Caelta complaint with a more accurate rendition of what has actually been reported in the NS Moderation forum. I also removed the link, on my authority of NSwiki sysop, as it does in fact contain sexual content, and we haven't been allowing that here. I will of course accept consensus rulings in this matter, and the link can be found in the History pages. Until consensus is reached, I would request that the link not be added back in to the page. → Fris Θtalk 23:48, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT)
