Difference between revisions of "Talk:League of Empire Loyalists"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(closing discussion)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{NoConsensusToDelete|24 April 2005}} --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 20:53, 24 Apr 2005 (GMT)
 +
 
The link on this particular article has been banned on NS, I thought NSwiki would do the same despite it being a seperate entity.  -ITD-
 
The link on this particular article has been banned on NS, I thought NSwiki would do the same despite it being a seperate entity.  -ITD-
  

Latest revision as of 16:53, 24 April 2005

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed by 24 April 2005 on ~~~~~, with no consensus to delete the article achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article. --Goobergunch|? 20:53, 24 Apr 2005 (GMT)

The link on this particular article has been banned on NS, I thought NSwiki would do the same despite it being a seperate entity. -ITD-

  • Comment. I have posted a request for a NationStates opinion on the NationStates forums. This request was made in my official capacity as NSwiki Founder. I will not be voting Keep or Delete at this time. --Goobergunch|? 01:16, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT)
  • I've replaced a blatantly POV description of the Caelta complaint with a more accurate rendition of what has actually been reported in the NS Moderation forum. I also removed the link, on my authority of NSwiki sysop, as it does in fact contain sexual content, and we haven't been allowing that here. I will of course accept consensus rulings in this matter, and the link can be found in the History pages. Until consensus is reached, I would request that the link not be added back in to the page. → Fris Θtalk 23:48, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT)

I get the feeling this is irrelevant now; unless I mis-typed the URL about 5 times, the LOEL boards appear to have vanished from Invision. I'll keep trying and edit this accordingly, but it seems that the LOEL has finally (and none too soon) been laid to rest. - DPUO

  • Based on the link in the page history, I concur. --Goobergunch|? 18:32, 3 Apr 2005 (GMT)