Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mariela of Melleray"
m |
m (Consensus issue) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*Nanakaland: What exactly would you suggest to make this 'excel' in your mind? I'm looking for constructive criticism, not bland comments. :D --[[User:Dorado|Dorado]] 16:54, 13 Mar 2005 (GMT) | *Nanakaland: What exactly would you suggest to make this 'excel' in your mind? I'm looking for constructive criticism, not bland comments. :D --[[User:Dorado|Dorado]] 16:54, 13 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
**I just don't see anything special here that makes it stand out against other character aricles. I know some others just as well done. Do one thing that's unique and done well and I'll change my vote to yes. - [[User:Nanakaland|Nanakaland]] 01:41, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT) | **I just don't see anything special here that makes it stand out against other character aricles. I know some others just as well done. Do one thing that's unique and done well and I'll change my vote to yes. - [[User:Nanakaland|Nanakaland]] 01:41, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Consensus issue == | ||
| + | |||
| + | If there are no further opinions on the article (or votes, for that matter) and seeing that the last edit was in fact mine, and not the author's, I will remove the FAC status on this article in exactly 48 hours from the time that I post this. Don't be discouraged from renominating this article later on if you feel it is worthy, but perhaps work towards improving the article so that it achieves a better voting result next time. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 19:07, 19 January 2006 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 19 January 2006
Mariela of Melleray FAC Vote (2/0/2)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I agree that an article doesn't need a special element to be exemplary. Rechze • (talk) 29 July 2005 13:01 (GMT)
- Well written and interesting. There's nothing special, but the prose is awesome. Ceorana|√∞ 01:49, 5 November 2005 (GMT)
Oppose
-
There are multitudes of character articles similar to this, I do not see how this excells over the others. Rechze • (talk) 11:25, 3 Mar 2005 (GMT)
Neutral
- NSwiki is in need of a good character article as a featured article, but I can't see anything here that excells. Nanakaland 20:01, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- I agree with Nanakaland. Maybe a bit more detail in terms of her accomplishments as queen? --Pacitalkia 00:51, 13 November 2005 (GMT)
Comments/Questions This is a self-nomination. I like to think it's fairly well written and complete as far as the character has developed so far. Also I'd like the comments to help point out details that could be fleshed out. Dorado 04:19, 3 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Rechze: I realize that character articles are a dime a dozen due to the very fact that they are essentially the same in that they describe a life. It's my hope that good writing and working to update the article as in character events occur would be something that NSwiki would like to showcase. Dorado 16:40, 3 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Nanakaland: What exactly would you suggest to make this 'excel' in your mind? I'm looking for constructive criticism, not bland comments. :D --Dorado 16:54, 13 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- I just don't see anything special here that makes it stand out against other character aricles. I know some others just as well done. Do one thing that's unique and done well and I'll change my vote to yes. - Nanakaland 01:41, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT)
Consensus issue
If there are no further opinions on the article (or votes, for that matter) and seeing that the last edit was in fact mine, and not the author's, I will remove the FAC status on this article in exactly 48 hours from the time that I post this. Don't be discouraged from renominating this article later on if you feel it is worthy, but perhaps work towards improving the article so that it achieves a better voting result next time. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 19:07, 19 January 2006 (GMT)
