Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nakism/Archive"

Revision as of 08:48, 5 December 2006

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

Oppose

On reflection, hard oppose. It's just a copy, and switching z's for k's really isn't that clever. ~Gruen 2alk 10:56, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
Agreed with Gruen. ^J e _y ^° 14:56, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
It just looks a bit too similar to the Nazism Wikipedia article linked above by Gruen. Even though that in itself isn't a bad thing, it's not original enough for a featured article I think :: BramP 22:53, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
Rip-off of a wikipedia article, thus very unoriginal. --sw il at ia 12:48, 5 December 2006 (GMT)

Neutral

Yes, it is a decent article. My neutral vote is a concern for precedent and image: do we want what is essentially a redub of Nazism on the front page of NSwiki? ~Gruen 2alk 10:48, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
Neutral, leaning towards Oppose. It's quite complete, and I'm sure you've spent time writing it all, but there's nothing particularly original in it. Aridd 23:50, 14 October 2006 (GMT)

Comments/Questions

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 # Agreed with Gruen. '''[[Jey|<font color="blue"><sup>J</sup></font>]][[User:Jey|<font color="red">e</font>]][[User_talk:Jey|<font color="green"><sub>y</sub></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jey|<font color="purple"><sup>°</sup></font>]]''' 14:56, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
 # It just looks a bit too similar to the Nazism Wikipedia article linked above by Gruen. Even though that in itself isn't a bad thing, it's not original enough for a featured article I think :: [[User:BramP|BramP]] 22:53, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
+# Rip-off of a wikipedia article, thus very unoriginal. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 12:48, 5 December 2006 (GMT)
 '''Neutral'''