Difference between revisions of "Talk:Neo-Carthage"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote ( | + | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (4/0/0) </h3> |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
This is a self nomination because, well, I find that are are very few well thought out and planned city articles. If there is a better one, I have yet to see it. -[[User:The Lightning Star|The Lightning Star]] | This is a self nomination because, well, I find that are are very few well thought out and planned city articles. If there is a better one, I have yet to see it. -[[User:The Lightning Star|The Lightning Star]] | ||
| + | -- | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 22 December 2005
Neo-Carthage FAC Vote (4/0/0)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- The Lightning Star 17:45, 11 Jun 2005 (GMT)
- I'll support, but I must say I do not like the position of the first picture. However, it doesn't detract too much from the overall quality of the article. Pacitalia|PaciTalk 00:12, 12 October 2005 (GMT)
- I agree with Pacitalia about the position of the first picture, but this is otherwise undoubtedly the best article I've seen on NSwiki about a city. --Pantocratoria 07:31, 27 October 2005 (GMT)
- This is the only good city article. Swilatia 12:20, 22 December 2005 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments/Questions This is a self nomination because, well, I find that are are very few well thought out and planned city articles. If there is a better one, I have yet to see it. -The Lightning Star --
