Difference between revisions of "Talk:Neo-Carthage"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
#I agree with [[User:Pacitalia|Pacitalia]] about the position of the first picture, but this is otherwise undoubtedly the best article I've seen on NSwiki about a city. --[[User:Pantocratoria|Pantocratoria]] 07:31, 27 October 2005 (GMT) | #I agree with [[User:Pacitalia|Pacitalia]] about the position of the first picture, but this is otherwise undoubtedly the best article I've seen on NSwiki about a city. --[[User:Pantocratoria|Pantocratoria]] 07:31, 27 October 2005 (GMT) | ||
#This is the only good city article. [[User:Swilatia|Swilatia]] 12:20, 22 December 2005 (GMT) | #This is the only good city article. [[User:Swilatia|Swilatia]] 12:20, 22 December 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Aye. It'd be nice to have a city article for a change, but maybe a little more detail could be added to some of the sections? Some of them (like economy) seem a little short considering their importance, but it's not a major thing. Good work. [[User:Praetonia|Praetonia]] 15:03, 14 February 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
Revision as of 11:03, 14 February 2006
Neo-Carthage FAC Vote (4/0/0)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- The Lightning Star 17:45, 11 Jun 2005 (GMT)
- I'll support, but I must say I do not like the position of the first picture. However, it doesn't detract too much from the overall quality of the article. Pacitalia|PaciTalk 00:12, 12 October 2005 (GMT)
- I agree with Pacitalia about the position of the first picture, but this is otherwise undoubtedly the best article I've seen on NSwiki about a city. --Pantocratoria 07:31, 27 October 2005 (GMT)
- This is the only good city article. Swilatia 12:20, 22 December 2005 (GMT)
- Aye. It'd be nice to have a city article for a change, but maybe a little more detail could be added to some of the sections? Some of them (like economy) seem a little short considering their importance, but it's not a major thing. Good work. Praetonia 15:03, 14 February 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments/Questions This is a self nomination because, well, I find that are are very few well thought out and planned city articles. If there is a better one, I have yet to see it. -The Lightning Star --
