Difference between revisions of "Talk:Noterelenda/Archive"

Revision as of 16:57, 2 December 2005

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

Excellent article - I always enjoy reading it, and Bedi/CH have done an amazing job. Kudos to them for that. --Paci talkia 05:46, 21 November 2005 (GMT)
I feel honored that this article has been nominated and I'd like to thank Paci for his compliment above. As such, I too shall vote in support. --Bedistan (jon seplab ) 23:33, 22 November 2005 (GMT)
Another language article, but I like the way this one is put together. Neat, informative, easy to follow: a good model. Gruen 2alk 23:39, 22 November 2005 (GMT)
It seems that if you can be bothered to create a major lanugage then you get FAC, but I think this one flows better than the other language articles that have had that status. Starblaydia 00:15, 23 November 2005 (GMT)
Only one major conlang left to go for an FAC! But this one really stands out. ~ Ceo|squawk 02:26, November 24, 2005 (GMT)
Without it, I wouldn’t have any bilingual states. :P Commerce Heights 20:57:41, 2005-12-02 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments/Questions

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 # It seems that if you can be bothered to create a major lanugage then you get FAC, but I think this one flows better than the other language articles that have had that status. [[User:Starblaydia|Starblaydia]] 00:15, 23 November 2005 (GMT)
 # Only one major conlang left to go for an FAC! But this one really stands out. ~ ''[[User:Ceorana|Ceo]]|[[User talk:Ceorana|<small>squawk</small>]]'' 02:26, November 24, 2005 (GMT)
+# Without it, I wouldn’t have any bilingual states. :P [[User:Commerce Heights|Commerce Heights]] 20:57:41, 2005-12-02 (GMT)
 '''Oppose'''