Difference between revisions of "Talk:Order of the Invisible Hand/Archive"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(POV check instead?)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
P.S. A good way to achieve NPOV would be through the addition of anti-Order opinions. -- [[User:Constantinopolis|Constantinopolis]] 18:36, 16 Nov 2004 (GMT)
 
P.S. A good way to achieve NPOV would be through the addition of anti-Order opinions. -- [[User:Constantinopolis|Constantinopolis]] 18:36, 16 Nov 2004 (GMT)
 +
*:I wonder if you know about the [[Template:POV check]] feature.  It's also a call for POV repairs, but it's not quite as strident as [[Template:NPOV]].  At first glance, I'd say this article calls more for a POV check than a full NPOV dispute. [[User:Frisbeeteria|&rarr; Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|&Theta;<small>''talk''</small>]] 20:31, 16 Nov 2004 (GMT)

Revision as of 16:31, 16 November 2004

Great job, Knoot, but there is one little problem with this article: It reeks of pro-Order POV. This is particularly evident in the "Writings" section. I won't start editing anything right now, because it's your article and I don't have the time for it anyway. However, I will put up a NPOV notice. -- Constantinopolis 18:34, 16 Nov 2004 (GMT)

P.S. A good way to achieve NPOV would be through the addition of anti-Order opinions. -- Constantinopolis 18:36, 16 Nov 2004 (GMT)

  • I wonder if you know about the Template:POV check feature. It's also a call for POV repairs, but it's not quite as strident as Template:NPOV. At first glance, I'd say this article calls more for a POV check than a full NPOV dispute. → Fris Θtalk 20:31, 16 Nov 2004 (GMT)