Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reformed Yugoslavia"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) (oppose FAC) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (1/ | + | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (1/2/1) </h3> |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
#I do not like the way this is set out at all. I do not believe there is sufficient detail, and the bulky pictures make for a very awkward layout. There are few links. I definitely oppose the nomination.[[User:Gruenberg2|Gruenberg2]] 07:42, 20 October 2005 (GMT) | #I do not like the way this is set out at all. I do not believe there is sufficient detail, and the bulky pictures make for a very awkward layout. There are few links. I definitely oppose the nomination.[[User:Gruenberg2|Gruenberg2]] 07:42, 20 October 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Looks like a rather unspectacular nationpage to me. Sorry, no. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 02:44, 21 October 2005 (GMT) | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
Revision as of 22:44, 20 October 2005
Reformed Yugoslavia FAC Vote (1/2/1)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
Oppose
- I do not like the way this is set out at all. I do not believe there is sufficient detail, and the bulky pictures make for a very awkward layout. There are few links. I definitely oppose the nomination.Gruenberg2 07:42, 20 October 2005 (GMT)
- Looks like a rather unspectacular nationpage to me. Sorry, no. → Fris Θtalk 02:44, 21 October 2005 (GMT)
Neutral
- I dislike the pictures' layout Rufus T. Firefly 13:59, 20 October 2005 (GMT) (@Gruenberg: sorry, I had missed to signed :) )
Comments/Questions
- Please remember to sign your votes, as I'm not sure unsigned votes count. Also update the vote tally when you vote: there is no automatic mechanism for this, that I know of.Gruenberg2 07:42, 20 October 2005 (GMT)
