Talk:Simooooo/FAC vote

This is an archive of the discussion. Please do not edit these comments.

Simooooo/FAC vote FAC Vote (1/5/0)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. fantastic. Disposablepuppetland 23:20, 31 August 2005 (GMT)

Oppose

1. This article could use quite a bit more work, and have some sort of graphic side to it - it's just all text. Until then, it's not really a qualified article. Pacitalia|PaciTalk 19:09, 2 October 2005 (GMT)
2. I really don't think it's complete enough. It seems like the sections about politics and geography are very minimal, and it mentions a "Council" but doesn't say anything about it. If more content was added I'd support it. -- Ceorant 16:41, 6 November 2005 (GMT)
3. You're kidding me, right? No way near enough detail, and the formatting is plain and unoriginal.Gruen2alk 20:18, 6 November 2005 (GMT)
4. I'm going to have to agree with those who have posted above; it can use a lot more in the information and aesthetic departments. Apologies for being so blunt. Macabees 03:21, 30 December 2005 (GMT)
5. Broken record time. Flesh out your sections, heavily. There are numerous other featured article canidates who present excellent examples; I'd use a rough estimate as one fairly decent picture per major section, at least, and at least two full paragraphs per subsection or undivided section. Either add more to each section, or combine them, but add more to the page entire, in any case. Go search through the Wikiedia for major nation's pages, and you'll get a good idea of what they look for here. At the very east, take a featured nation you like the look of, strip the text out, and fill as appropriate for your country. -- Nairatsa Complain 6:41, 7 January 2006 (GMT)

Neutral