Talk:TechWiki

Unless there's a bigger explanation about this Wiki planned for this article, it seems too much like an advertisement to be included on NSwiki. Plus, the editor of this page is only editing through an IP username, which means we can't communicate with you in order to see what exactly these plans are - hopefully you do post here, though. If you can help us by elaborating this article a little bit more, I'll remove the inclusion and stub tags. --Pacitalkia 22:41, 14 November 2005 (GMT)

Since no pages link to this one, it doesn't really seem like it belongs here. ~ Ceorant (or rave) 23:22, November 17, 2005 (GMT)

Although I didn't write this article I can expand upon it if you would like. (Unsigned comment by User:Macabees → Ceo\squawk 04:46, December 2, 2005 (GMT))

The person who wrote it is the player of Space Union. Maybe a TG to him would be in order? → Ceo\squawk 04:46, December 2, 2005 (GMT)

If his last edit was within the last 60 days, message him on his userpage. If not, TG him through NS. He still is active (we're in an alliance together). --Pacitalkia 05:15, 2 December 2005 (GMT)

The TechWiki appears dead. I'm deleting this. Gruen2alk 09:26, 9 January 2006 (GMT)

The TechWiki itself doesn't seem that active. If it dies a death, then this article would cease to serve a point. Perhaps we should see what happens with that? Gruen2alk 11:36, 2 December 2005 (GMT)

In all actuality I'm the administration and webmaster to TechWiki and so I would be best to finish this article since I know what I'm talking about when it comes to what TechWiki stands for. Regardless, the issue of inactivity has some grounds, but then again, I haven't been trying my hardest to get it active since I really don't know much about Wiki and am still learning. Nonetheless, it's really up to the NSWiki sysops. Macabees 17:12, 6 December 2005 (GMT)

{{inclusion}} debates are for all NSwiki community members, not just sysops. The point is: if TechWiki is going to be active, and if the article on NSwiki is filled out accordingly, I could see a point to the article remaining. Afterall, we have an article on NSTracker. But if the TechWiki isn't going to be active, then the article won't serve much point. In short, I'd advocate waiting. There's no immediate dash to remove the article. I vote keep, but also keep this debate open, and assess things a little later. Gruen2alk 19:00, 6 December 2005 (GMT)