Difference between revisions of "Talk:The East Pacific"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) |
(→the East Pacific FAC Vote (0/2/0)) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
| + | #1 I submitted it so that anyone who sees it may be inclined to add to the entry and therefore improve it, Especially those who know the prehistory of the region a little better such as Perhaps a Delegate history prior to Lothlandermore. [[User:Loop|Loop]] 18:37, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
# | # | ||
Revision as of 14:37, 28 October 2004
the East Pacific FAC Vote (0/2/0)
- Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --Goobergunch
Support
Oppose
- I don't think this article meets the standard of "one of the finest examples of NSwiki's work." There's a lot that could be said about the East Pacific, and this article doesn't do it justice in my opinion. Is The East Pacific a subject that could get a featured article on it? Yes. Does the article at present qualify it for featured status? No. (Summary of opinion shamelessly stolen from Goobs CACE comment) -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 13:42, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)--Goobergunch|? 17:38, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Ummmm, no. Not at present, at least. → Frisbeeteria Θtalk 16:15, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Neutral
Comments/Questions
- 1 I submitted it so that anyone who sees it may be inclined to add to the entry and therefore improve it, Especially those who know the prehistory of the region a little better such as Perhaps a Delegate history prior to Lothlandermore. Loop 18:37, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
